2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-017-0119-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-benefit analysis to assess seismic mitigation options in Mexican public school buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Anelli et al [48] proposed a cost-benefit index and an innovative resilience indicator that helps to identify the best prioritization strategy for retrofit interventions. Jaimes and Niño [49] also proposed a cost-benefit methodology, based on numerical analysis of the buildings, to assess possible interventions, such as retrofitting or reconstruction of structures focused on mitigation of direct physical losses due to seismic actions. López et al [12] contributed to the development of a national risk-reduction program in Venezuela, starting with the assessment of the seismic performance of two typical schools, which were analyzed through nonlinear pushover analysis.…”
Section: Analytical Approaches For Risk and Vulnerability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anelli et al [48] proposed a cost-benefit index and an innovative resilience indicator that helps to identify the best prioritization strategy for retrofit interventions. Jaimes and Niño [49] also proposed a cost-benefit methodology, based on numerical analysis of the buildings, to assess possible interventions, such as retrofitting or reconstruction of structures focused on mitigation of direct physical losses due to seismic actions. López et al [12] contributed to the development of a national risk-reduction program in Venezuela, starting with the assessment of the seismic performance of two typical schools, which were analyzed through nonlinear pushover analysis.…”
Section: Analytical Approaches For Risk and Vulnerability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic hazard in CDMX was estimated for return periods prescribed by CENAPRED of 20, 125, 250, and 475 years. The methodology considers the following steps (Jaimes and Niño, 2017): a) characterization of the different seismic sources potentially affecting CDMX (subduction, intraslab, and crustal) (Figure 2); b) use of the appropriate ground motion models depending on the types of earthquakes that each seismic source may generate such as interplate, intermediate, and shallow crustal depth (Abrahamson and Silva 1997;Jaimes et al 2006Jaimes et al , 2015Jaimes and García-Soto 2020); c) convolution of the response spectral ratios (soil transfer functions between each instrumented and reference sites; Rosenblueth and Arciniega 1992) with the ground motion predictions; and d) probability estimation of shaking intensity (e.g., peak ground acceleration, or spectral pseudo-acceleration corresponding to the first-mode period of vibration) for the different return periods.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Seismic Hazardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…- Wei et al, 2016;Ferreira et al, 2017;Jaimes and Niño, 2017;Mwafy and Elkholy, 2017;Rizzian et al, 2017)가 활발히 진행되고 있다. 또한 취약한 건물을 식별하거나(예.…”
Section: 기타의견unclassified