Cost analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell systems

Abstract

Tradeoff between capital cost and the operating cost can be seen in the design of proton exchange membrane fuel cell systems. The polarization curve indicates that operating in the region of lower current densities implies less operating cost (hydrogen fuel) and higher capital cost (larger membrane electrode assembly area). The opposite effects are observed when one operates in the region of higher current densities. Therefore, an appropriate design should take both factors into account and the optimality depends on the corresponding costs of hydrogen and membrane area. An analytical cost model is constructed to describe such an economic balance in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell system. The objective function of the optimization is the total annual cost. Six scenarios are used to illustrate the optimal design based on the total annual cost as cost and materials factors fluctuate.

Design of fuel‐cell micro‐cogeneration systems through modeling and optimization

“…On the contrary, the bulk of the capital cost is contributed by the size of the membrane electrode assembly (MEA). a, The compromise between the capital investment and operating cost is not the only motivation for the trade‐off investigation between size and efficiency. In the current consumer demographic, the size of the fuel‐cell system relative to a conventional boiler may be a deciding factor for households that lack substantial spare floor space.…”

Synergistic Niobium Doped Two-Dimensional Zirconium Diselenide: An Efficient Electrocatalyst for O2 Reduction Reaction

“…To date, platinum (Pt) and Pt-based materials serve as a suitable catalyst for the reduction of O 2 at the cathode in the fuel cell. − Moreover, a sizable overpotential higher than 0.20 V is observed, even with the state-of-art Pt-based catalyst . The utilization of Pt catalysts account for approximately 40–50% of the total cost associated with fuel cell stacks . So, the cost of the fuel cell imposes serious limitations on the commercialization of the fuel cell.…”

“…9 The utilization of Pt catalysts account for approximately 40−50% of the total cost associated with fuel cell stacks. 10 So, the cost of the fuel cell imposes serious limitations on the commercialization of the fuel cell. Moreover, the shortage of noble metals in the earth's crust and their insufficient stability toward the byproducts hinder their widespread applications in modern science and technology.…”

Recent Advances in Non-Precious Transition Metal/Nitrogen-doped Carbon for Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts in PEMFCs

“…Typically, there are three main obstacles limiting the mass production of ORR catalysts: (i) the high cost. Currently, the most common-used and effective catalysts in PEMFCs are still Pt-based catalysts, of which the scarcity and high cost have resulted in an excessive pricing of PEMFCs [16]; (ii) the low performance. The complex mechanisms and sluggish reaction kinetics of ORRs necessarily lead to high potential demands and low current density outputs [17].…”