Cost Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Open Colectomy in Patients with Colon Cancer: Results from a Large Nationwide Population Database

Abstract

Laparoscopic colectomy (LC) is a safe and reliable option for patients with colon cancer. This study examined factors associated with LC use and cost differences between LC and open colectomy (OC). Using the Cost & Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database (2008), patients with colon cancer undergoing elective LC or OC were selected. Chi square and Mann-Whitney tests were used to assess differences between LC and OC. Logistic and multiple regression analysis was used to determine variables associated with LC and predictors of cost. All analysis was weighted. A total of 63,950 patients were identified (LC 8.1%, OC 91.9%). The majority was female (52.7%), white (61.4%), using Medicare (61.1%), and had surgery performed at a large (64.2%), nonteaching (56.9%), urban (87.3%) hospital in the South (37.7%). Mean age was 70 years. On unadjusted analysis, LC was associated with a lower mortality rate (1.7 vs 2.4%), fewer complications (18.9 vs 27.1%), shorter length of stay (5 vs 7 days), and lower total charges ($41,971 vs $43,459, all P < 0.001). LC is a less expensive but less popular surgical option for colon cancer. Stage, race, Charlson score, teaching status, location, and hospital size influence the use of a laparoscopic approach. LC is associated with fewer complications and decreased mortality which contribute to its lower cost as compared with OC.

Improved survival with early adjuvant chemotherapy after colonic resection for stage III colonic cancer: A nationwide study

“…These results are confirmed on a nationwide basis in our data. The delay after open surgery may be due to increased risk of postoperative complications and morbidity associated with this surgical modality . Indeed, delayed initiation and even risk of omission of adjuvant therapy occur in the presence of postoperative complications .…”

Palliative resection of the primary tumour in patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta‐analysis of the early outcome after laparoscopic and open colectomy

“…While the operative cost, time and equipment needed for laparoscopic colectomy are greater , a recent large nationwide cost analysis by Vaid et al . found that laparoscopic colectomy is less expensive than open colectomy due to a lower complication rate, decreased mortality and shorter length of stay . Therefore, the results of this review may point to a possibility of reduced cost of laparoscopic compared with open colectomy in Stage IV colorectal cancer.…”

How Patient Complexity and Surgical Approach Influence Episode-Based Payment Models for Colectomy

“…16 Next, we evaluated how changes in surgical practice, specifically proportional use of laparoscopic colectomy, would influence hospitals' reconciliation payments. Laparoscopy is increasingly used for colon surgery, and is associated with lower costs than traditional open operations, 6,18 even after accounting for selection bias and differences between patients undergoing each approach. 10 The use of laparoscopy is not currently a factor in determining Medicare payments.…”