Cosmopolitanism, Consumer Ethnocentrism, and Materialism: An Eight-Country Study of Antecedents and Outcomes

Abstract

Although there is a consensus that industries are globalizing, the notion that consumer attitudes and behaviors worldwide are likewise homogenizing remains disputed. Despite widespread discourse on this topic, there is a dearth of empirical investigations. This international research examines similarities and differences with respect to the nature of three consumer attitudinal dispositions: cosmopolitanism, consumer ethnocentrism, and materialism. The authors cross-culturally compare demographic antecedents with these dispositions, as well as behavioral outcomes. They test the validation of the construct measures and associated hypotheses using survey data drawn from consumers in eight countries and structural equation modeling techniques, including multigroup analysis. Empirical findings broadly support the cross-cultural applicability of the constructs, though the links to the various demographic antecedents vary considerably from sample to sample. The role of each construct on behavior also varies substantially across the range of product categories considered and across and between national groups.

Should Charity Begin at Home? An Empirical Investigation of Consumers’ Responses to Companies’ Varying Geographic Allocations of Donation Budgets

“…One item adapted from Cleveland et al (2009) captured consumers' product category involvement (i.e., "Tea is very important to me").…”

Antecedents and outcomes of consumer environmentally friendly attitudes and behaviour

“…An 'antecedent' refers to a factor that precedes a specific attitude or behavior, while an 'outcome' is the result of this attitude or behaviour. Although these terms may have a temporal connotation (in the sense that first 'antecedents' take place, then attitude or behaviour is formulated, and 'outcome' is the finality) many cross-sectional studies (e.g., Dröge & Halstead, 1991;Menon, Bharadwaj, Adidam, & Edison, 1999;Myers, Daugherty, & Autry, 2000;Atuahene-Gima & Murray, 2004;Alden, Steenkamp, & Batra, 2006;Cleveland, Laroche, & Papadopoulos, 2009;and Walsh, Mitchell, Jackson, & Beatty, 2009) have extensively used this terminology to express the causal relationships among constructs. 2.…”

Asia’s materialists: Reconciling collectivism and materialism

“…For example, the Anglican view, ''the love of money is the root of all evil'', dictates that material acquisition distracts one from the true purpose of being, that is, the fulfillment of collective and religious values (Veer & Shankar, 2011). As such, the anti-materialism view of major religions has rendered materialistic passion a vice or an unacceptable moral transgression (Cleveland, Laroche, & Papadopoulos, 2009). Such belief explains how the individualistic culture breeds a type of materialism that is duly opposed to collective-oriented values.…”