2002
DOI: 10.1177/026327602128931233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmopolitan Modernity: Everyday Imaginaries and the Register of Difference

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Vieten 2011) Only ten years ago academics were optimistic about the potential of cultural cosmopolitanism to deepen the political European Union project, epitomized in intraEuropean cross-border mobility. Early critique of mainstream cosmopolitanism was put forward across different disciplinary fields, by scholars such as Cheah and Robbins (1998;Cheah 2006) by feminist academics such as Nava (2002Nava ( , 2006; see also Kofman 2005) and post-colonial voices such as Mignolo (2000Mignolo ( , 2002; see also Nwanko, 2005). Cultural theorists such as Clifford (1992, p. 108) stressed the need to avoid 'the excessive localism of particularistic cultural relativism as well as the overly global vision of capitalist or technocratic monoculture'.…”
Section: Previous Research Underlines An Ambivalent Position Of Visibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Vieten 2011) Only ten years ago academics were optimistic about the potential of cultural cosmopolitanism to deepen the political European Union project, epitomized in intraEuropean cross-border mobility. Early critique of mainstream cosmopolitanism was put forward across different disciplinary fields, by scholars such as Cheah and Robbins (1998;Cheah 2006) by feminist academics such as Nava (2002Nava ( , 2006; see also Kofman 2005) and post-colonial voices such as Mignolo (2000Mignolo ( , 2002; see also Nwanko, 2005). Cultural theorists such as Clifford (1992, p. 108) stressed the need to avoid 'the excessive localism of particularistic cultural relativism as well as the overly global vision of capitalist or technocratic monoculture'.…”
Section: Previous Research Underlines An Ambivalent Position Of Visibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent authors (Regev, 2007;Papastergiadis, 2007;Chaney, 2002;Nava, 2002) have advocated the idea of an "aesthetic" or "cultural" cosmopolitanism, located "at the individual level", and explained as a "cultural disposition involving an intellectual and aesthetic stance of openness towards peoples, places and experiences from different cultures, especially those from different "nations" (…) or as having taste for "the wider shores of cultural experience" (Regev, 2007: 124). It is an interpretation of cosmopolitanism as a subjective reality, as a "form of consciousness" that involves a paradigm shift.…”
Section: "Cosmopolitan" Diversity and Modern Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cosmopolitans we are drawn to in social science research are often globally migrant figures traversing in apparently evenly globalized communication, transport and cultural networks (Binnie and Skeggs 2004). Formulations of a 'cosmopolitan identity' remain Eurocentric and the historical trajectory of the cosmopolitan imagination and vernacular expressions in everyday local life and culture have, on the whole, been neglected (Nava 2002).…”
Section: Re-thinking Postcolonial Cosmopolitanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%