2018
DOI: 10.1785/0120170336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coseismic Rupture and Preliminary Slip Estimates for the Papatea Fault and Its Role in the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura, New Zealand, Earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
73
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
12
73
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For our analyses, we scaled our slip measurements in proportion to the net slip, such that larger net displacement values are more represented than smaller ones. Generally, our kinematic orientation measurements (summarized for each fault in Figure S3) reflect the broader deformation patterns shown in Figure and agree with broad‐scale field observations of deformation and uplift (Clark et al, ; Kearse et al, ; Langridge et al, ; Litchfield et al, ; Nicol et al, ; Stirling et al, ; Williams et al, ). Deviations from the overall fault plane attitudes and kinematics stem primarily from local fault structural complexities, such as restraining or releasing bends and steps, which occur at all observable length scales (≤100 to >10 km).…”
Section: Methods and Observationssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For our analyses, we scaled our slip measurements in proportion to the net slip, such that larger net displacement values are more represented than smaller ones. Generally, our kinematic orientation measurements (summarized for each fault in Figure S3) reflect the broader deformation patterns shown in Figure and agree with broad‐scale field observations of deformation and uplift (Clark et al, ; Kearse et al, ; Langridge et al, ; Litchfield et al, ; Nicol et al, ; Stirling et al, ; Williams et al, ). Deviations from the overall fault plane attitudes and kinematics stem primarily from local fault structural complexities, such as restraining or releasing bends and steps, which occur at all observable length scales (≤100 to >10 km).…”
Section: Methods and Observationssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In the 2016 earthquake, however, the sense of throw was opposite to the long‐term trend: the Jordan Thrust fault experienced primarily normal‐dextral, SE side up motion (Figures and ). This anomalous sense of slip resulted from southward movement of the Papatea block (Figure ), which experienced up to ~7.3 m of left‐lateral displacement and ~9.0 m of west side up vertical slip along the Papatea fault (Hamling et al, ; Langridge et al, ; this study). This Papatea block motion is attributed to either (1) the extrusion of the Papatea block to accommodate space between the Hope and Jordan Thrust faults (Hamling et al, ; Langridge et al, ) or (2) convergence of the Papatea fault with a deeper (blind) north or northwest dipping detachment underlying the Papatea block (Cesca et al, ; Van Dissen & Yeats, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rapid exhumation of Clarence foot wall samples within the Clarence Valley potentially relates to broad uplift associated with the dextral‐reverse Kekerengu Fault to its south (Figure ). Young AHe ages in the foot wall of the Jordan Thrust could relate to nearby uplift of the Papatea Block along the north striking sinistral reverse Papatea Fault (Langridge et al, ) or possibly faults offshore (Barnes et al, ), which are thought to lead to uplift of marine terraces along the Pacific coast at 1 mm/year (Ota et al, , ). We attribute rapid exhumation within the Amuri Range to the initiation of the Hope Fault sometime between 8 and 5 Ma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%