1972
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90534-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corynebacterium vaginale vaginitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Gardner and Dukes (7) first isolated Gardnerella (Haemophilus) vaginalis from women with nonspecific vaginitis (NSV) in 1955, there has been controversy over the role of this organism in NSV. Some investigators (6,13) have noticed no difference in G. vaginalis prevalence between vaginal fluid of women with vaginitis and vaginal fluid of women without vaginitis, whereas others (1,12,14) have isolated G. vaginalis more often from women with NSV than from normal control women. Variables affecting studies of the correlation of G. vaginalis with NSV may include criteria used to diagnose NSV, comparability of NSV patients with controls, media used for isolation of G. vaginalis, and criteria used for identification of this organism. Recent taxonomic studies (10, 15) have proposed placement of this organism in a new genus, Gardnerella, and have clarified the characteristics of this organism, making more-accurate identification possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Gardner and Dukes (7) first isolated Gardnerella (Haemophilus) vaginalis from women with nonspecific vaginitis (NSV) in 1955, there has been controversy over the role of this organism in NSV. Some investigators (6,13) have noticed no difference in G. vaginalis prevalence between vaginal fluid of women with vaginitis and vaginal fluid of women without vaginitis, whereas others (1,12,14) have isolated G. vaginalis more often from women with NSV than from normal control women. Variables affecting studies of the correlation of G. vaginalis with NSV may include criteria used to diagnose NSV, comparability of NSV patients with controls, media used for isolation of G. vaginalis, and criteria used for identification of this organism. Recent taxonomic studies (10, 15) have proposed placement of this organism in a new genus, Gardnerella, and have clarified the characteristics of this organism, making more-accurate identification possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tNo of strains with more than 20% adhesion in patients with clue cells: 21-40% (13), 41-60% (8), 61-80%(7) and 81-100%(11); and in patients without clue cells: 21-40% (2), 41-60% (1), 61-80% (2), and 81-100%(2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gardnerella vaginalis has been implicated as the etiological agent of nonspecific vaginitis (NSV) in numerous studies (1,11,13,15,19,20) foliowing the initial report by Gardner and Dukes (6). However, the significance of the isolation of this organism from the lower genital tract has been controversial because asymptomatic women are frequently found to have positive cultures for G. vaginalis (5,12,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%