2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corruption, growth and political regimes: Cross country evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
199
4
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
199
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…16 The exceptions are papers on investment flows to the sector, typically flows of foreign direct investment (FDI). For a recent paper that includes all relevant references on corruption and FDI, see Ghosh Banerjee and others (2006) 17 See for example Rock and Bonnett (2004), Pellegrini and Gerlagh (2004), and Méndez and Sepúlveda (2006). 18 Examples are Xu (2002) andLaffont andN'Guessan (1999). infrastructure outputs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The exceptions are papers on investment flows to the sector, typically flows of foreign direct investment (FDI). For a recent paper that includes all relevant references on corruption and FDI, see Ghosh Banerjee and others (2006) 17 See for example Rock and Bonnett (2004), Pellegrini and Gerlagh (2004), and Méndez and Sepúlveda (2006). 18 Examples are Xu (2002) andLaffont andN'Guessan (1999). infrastructure outputs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the corruption appears to have no impact on growth in low quality political regimes. The strong point of this study is that, instead of splitting the sample of countries according to some predetermined rule like Méndez and Sepúlveda (2006) [26] did, the data is allowed to determine to which of two potential growth regimes a country belongs. More recent studies also support this result.…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saha and Ben-Ali (2017) elaborate that corruption may have a positive impact by "greasing the wheels of economy" as it may help in minimizing costs caused by redundant bureacratic activities. It is argued that corruption is beneficial for economic growth by avoiding bureaucratic regulations that may be "cumbersome" (Mendez & Sepulveda, 2006). Furthermore, several economists believe that corruption enhances economic growth in certain cases; some found that in order to maximize economic output there should exist an optimum level of corruption and others found that while corruption may have a negative effect on growth, this effect has a diminishing impact and becomes insignificant (Huang, 2016).…”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%