Corruption and women in cabinets: Informal barriers to recruitment in the executive

Abstract

Research on corruption and women in politics has mainly focused on legislatures, generally finding that corruption decreases the election of women. This article turns the spotlight to the executive branch—an arena where selection is less transparent than recruitment to legislative seats—and examines if corruption decrease the share of ministers who are women. Drawing on feminist institutionalist theories, we posit that in an environment of high political corruption, (male) elites involved in cabinet formation will tend to appoint ministers whom they can trust with secretive tasks. In systems with corrupt networks, relative newcomers, such as women, should face obstacles to career advancement. The article tests this reasoning empirically on a global sample of countries across time. Using a new indicator measuring corruption in executive bodies, we find support for our argument; corruption tends to hinder women's presence in cabinets, albeit only in democracies and not autocracies.

Silver or Lead? Why Violence and Corruption Limit Women’s Representation

“…Several studies have observed that more women are usually elected to the national parliament in countries with less corruption (Dollar, Fisman and Gatti 1999;Bjarnegard 2013;Stockemer 2011). Similar patterns have been observed for women in local councils (Sundstrom and Wangnerud 2016), and cabinets (Stockemer and Sundstrom 2017). Interpreting the underlying reasons for the correlation, and the controls required for well-specified models, remains a matter for debate (Sung 2003(Sung , 2012.…”

The roots of the gender pay gap for nonprofit CEOs

“…The inequality in access to workplace authority is one of the recurring themes explaining the gender pay gap (Stockemer & Sundström, 2019). Glass ceiling-the barriers against women's hiring and advancement to top management-is one of the most commonly used concepts when discussing the gender inequality in executive hiring (Sampson & Moore, 2008).…”

An agenda for the study of Public Administration in Developing Countries

“…Widening the scope of our studies to include developing countries also substantially increases the number of units whose behavior we can observe, as recent work published in Governance demonstrates (cf. Jindra & Vaz, 2019; Shockley, Ewers, Nardis, & Gengler, 2018; Stockemer & Sundstrom, 2019). The role of international organizations, or, for instance, country performance rankings (see e.g., Kelley & Simmons, 2020) can be better understood, and influences better identified, through an increase in statistical power that is borne of the widening of our cross‐country scope.…”