2015
DOI: 10.1086/682913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corruption and the Incumbency Disadvantage: Theory and Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
74
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This might reflect important differences in the level of decentralization and the fragmentation of the party system. The paper also relates to the dis-incumbency effect literature (Klašnja, 2015;Klašnja and Titiunik, 2017;Uppal, 2009). Our party alignment results for mayoral elections are consistent with Klašnja and Titiunik (2017) in that party incumbency is likely to be a disadvantage when running for reelection when the party system is weak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This might reflect important differences in the level of decentralization and the fragmentation of the party system. The paper also relates to the dis-incumbency effect literature (Klašnja, 2015;Klašnja and Titiunik, 2017;Uppal, 2009). Our party alignment results for mayoral elections are consistent with Klašnja and Titiunik (2017) in that party incumbency is likely to be a disadvantage when running for reelection when the party system is weak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The primary methodological innovation of this article is the development of comparative indicators of institutionalized grand corruption in public procurement for both countries, which addresses a gap long recognized in the literature (Knack 2006). Our approach builds on prior scholarship with similar datasets, making use of a range of public procurement "red flags" across Europe (Klasnja 2016;Mungiu-Pippidi 2016;Charron et al 2017;Fazekas & Kocsis 2017). The measurement approach exploits the fact that for institutionalized grand corruption to work, procurement contracts have to be awarded recurrently to companies belonging to the corrupt network.…”
Section: Indicators Of Institutionalized Grand Corruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(M. M. Bechtel & Hainmueller, 2011), while corrupt leaders may be punished at the polls (Klašnja, 2015). In addition, efficient handling of relief funds may serve as a signal of (local or national) government presence and competence even for voters in localities which may not have been directly affected by the disaster.…”
Section: The Drivers Of Corruption In Local Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%