“…The use of mZVI rather than nZVI was preferred in this study due to the lower cost (1/20 to 1/3 compared to nZVI), lower corrosion rate (10 to 30 times lower than nZVI, (Velimirovic et al, 2014a)), and easier handling of microsized particles (provided as a dry powder). The design of this pilot test, and in general of any field-scale mZVI or nZVI delivery, is the result of the compromise among different, and often contrasting, needs: the slurry viscosity has to be sufficiently high to keep particles suspended until delivered into the porous medium, but sufficiently low to limit the injection pressure below or close to the critical pressure of the aquifer; the discharge rate is to be sufficiently low to limit the injection pressure, but sufficiently high to complete the delivery within the sedimentation time of the particles; the monitoring setup must allow a reliable, realtime control of all relevant parameters during injection (discharge rate, injected concentration, delivery pressure) and a cost-affordable but detailed reconstruction of the spatial distribution of the iron after injection, but must not interfere with the injection operations themselves.…”