2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.02.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrosion of amorphous and nanocrystalline Fe-based alloys and its influence on their magnetic behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from Table 3 that the highest value of polarization resistance is shown by the sample whose surface has undergone complete surface treatment (sample D) while the lowest values of polarization resistance are shown by the sample A whose surface was ultrasonically cleaned in ethanol and rinsed with deionized water. This is in accordance with the results of Baron and associates [19,20] which showed that the chemical and electrochemical surface treatment improved the corrosion resistance of AISI 316L stainless steel compared to mechanically polished surface. Reduction of surface roughness leads to an increase in the values of polarization resistance [18], and the minimum surface roughness has the sample D.…”
Section: Polarization Measurementssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It can be seen from Table 3 that the highest value of polarization resistance is shown by the sample whose surface has undergone complete surface treatment (sample D) while the lowest values of polarization resistance are shown by the sample A whose surface was ultrasonically cleaned in ethanol and rinsed with deionized water. This is in accordance with the results of Baron and associates [19,20] which showed that the chemical and electrochemical surface treatment improved the corrosion resistance of AISI 316L stainless steel compared to mechanically polished surface. Reduction of surface roughness leads to an increase in the values of polarization resistance [18], and the minimum surface roughness has the sample D.…”
Section: Polarization Measurementssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The obtained results also seem to be confirmed by the research carried out by baron [16]. baron confirms a positive influence of the chemical passivation on the improvement of steel corrosion resistance in Tyrod's solution due to the change of chemical composition of the surface layer.…”
Section: Fig 3 Representative Logarithmic Curvessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A comparison of passive current density I pass , corrosion/transpassivation potential E corr and corrosion rate CPR for some Fe-based metallic glasses and their crystalline alloy is summarized in Table 4 [69][70][71]. It can be observed from Table 4 that the corrosion/passive current density and corrosion rate increase for the crystalline alloys compared with metallic glass, while corrosion/transpassivation potential depends on their compositions.…”
Section: Effects Of Microstructure Homogeneitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The decrease of corrosion resistance in crystalline alloys obtained by the isothermal heat treatment of Fe-M-B (M = Nb, Zr) metallic glasses is explained by the formation of the α-Fe crystalline phase that has greater corrosion susceptibility in compared to that of the amorphous phase [70]. Long et al thought the galvanic effects between adjacent phases with different composition were resulted in the deterioration of corrosion resistance for Fe-Co-B-Si-Nb metallic glass [72].…”
Section: Effects Of Microstructure Homogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%