2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2014.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrosion condition evaluations of historic concrete icons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limit imposed by advisory councils for historic preservation for extraction of materials and destructive tests is a challenge faced during investigations, and also reported by other researchers [41]. In the present study, these restrictions limited the investigation to few localized areas, and the fracture in repaired areas only, which are inappropriate conditions for evaluation of large-size structure and extensive surface exposed to weathering.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The limit imposed by advisory councils for historic preservation for extraction of materials and destructive tests is a challenge faced during investigations, and also reported by other researchers [41]. In the present study, these restrictions limited the investigation to few localized areas, and the fracture in repaired areas only, which are inappropriate conditions for evaluation of large-size structure and extensive surface exposed to weathering.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Research on monitoring has been geared to controlling geomorphological risk and its effects on structural behaviour (Gentile and Saisi, 2013;Romero et al, 2018), with a growing number of papers on temperature and relative humidity. Gina et al (Crevello et al, 2015) developed a method focusing on the need for continuous monitoring as an automatic diagnostic mechanism for detecting further damage to heritage elements.…”
Section: 𝜎(𝑋)mentioning
confidence: 99%