2014
DOI: 10.1590/rbeb.2014.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrosion and microstructural characterization of martensitic stainless steels submitted to industrial thermal processes for use in surgical tools

Abstract: Introduction: The mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of a material are dependent on its microstructure and can be modifi ed by phase transformation. When a phase transformation occurs in a material it usually forms at least one new phase, with physical-chemical characteristics that differ from the original phase. Moreover, most phase transformations do not occur instantly. This paper presents an evaluation of the phase transformation of martensitic stainless steels ASTM 420A and ASTM 440C when subm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After cooling from 1150 °C, however, the strain/temperature curve appears differently showing an anomaly in the curve slope at 367 ± 10 °C. This phenomena has been detected in several MSS grades such as X20–45Cr13 and X40–60CrMoV14 and is described by Garcia de Andres et al as a successive transformation of austenite within different stages that are limited by different points for M s (M s,I , M s,II ). While M s,I is used to represent the temperature at which a massive transformation of austenite into martensite occurs, M s,II represents the splitting point above M s,I .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…After cooling from 1150 °C, however, the strain/temperature curve appears differently showing an anomaly in the curve slope at 367 ± 10 °C. This phenomena has been detected in several MSS grades such as X20–45Cr13 and X40–60CrMoV14 and is described by Garcia de Andres et al as a successive transformation of austenite within different stages that are limited by different points for M s (M s,I , M s,II ). While M s,I is used to represent the temperature at which a massive transformation of austenite into martensite occurs, M s,II represents the splitting point above M s,I .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The surface microhardness (196.94 Hv) of lasertreated sample was slightly improved by 8.7% from the as-received sample (181.2 Hv). This finding can be attributed to the martensite formation on the surface, and the hardness was significantly higher than the core original material due to the rapid cooling effect of the PLAL treatment [28]. This gradual enhancement was only apparent at <400 µm depth from the surface.…”
Section: Vickers Hardness Testmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the literature different possibilities of evaluation are described and evaluated. [8][9][10][11][12] When looking at the change in length during cooling after austenitizing for 5 minutes with different evaluation methods something is noticeable which cannot be explained directly. With a few of the usual evaluation methods, incorrect martensite start temperatures would be determined.…”
Section: A Determination Of Martensite Startmentioning
confidence: 99%