2021
DOI: 10.1002/suco.202100165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corroded Tension Chord Model: Load‐deformation behavior of structures with locally corroded reinforcement

Abstract: Localised corrosion may considerably impair the load‐bearing and deformation capacity of reinforced concrete structures. The Corroded Tension Chord Model allows investigating the related effects. The model combines the effects of tension stiffening and strain localisation due to a local cross‐section loss to calculate the load‐deformation behaviour of tension members and entire structural elements containing locally corroded reinforcing bars on a sound mechanical basis. Based on simple equilibrium consideratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is due to a more severe strain localization for larger cross‐section losses and depends on the individual pit distribution among the reinforcing bars. It was theoretically explained by Haefliger and Kaufmann 8 for tension chords, including the tension stiffening effect, and by Chen et al 9 for bare reinforcing bars, and is validated for members subject to bending by the experiments presented in this paper. Note, however, that theoretical calculations 8 predict a trend reversal for structures containing an even smaller amount of damaged bars with larger cross‐section loss (exemplified in the mentioned study 8 for 20% of bars at normalζi=0.45 or 10% of bars at normalζi=0.9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This effect is due to a more severe strain localization for larger cross‐section losses and depends on the individual pit distribution among the reinforcing bars. It was theoretically explained by Haefliger and Kaufmann 8 for tension chords, including the tension stiffening effect, and by Chen et al 9 for bare reinforcing bars, and is validated for members subject to bending by the experiments presented in this paper. Note, however, that theoretical calculations 8 predict a trend reversal for structures containing an even smaller amount of damaged bars with larger cross‐section loss (exemplified in the mentioned study 8 for 20% of bars at normalζi=0.45 or 10% of bars at normalζi=0.9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…These findings confirm the conclusions drawn from Figure 12, that is, the load‐deformation behavior cannot be explained based on the mean cross‐section loss alone. The results can be attributed to the superposition of the influence of the mentioned triaxial stress state and the local bending moments in the pit region, combined with the resulting variation of the localization effect explained by Haefliger and Kaufmann 8 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations