Corrigendum to “Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Anorganic Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss) and Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite (Ostim) in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation”

Shirmohammadi, Adileh; Roshangar, Leila; Chitsazi, Mohammad Taghi; Pourabbas, Reza; Faramarzi, Masoumeh; Rahmanpour, Nasrin

doi:10.1155/2017/7258513

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the bone density possessed by bovine is higher than eggshell, there is no significant difference regarding the bone regeneration. Hence, with the ability to increase bone regeneration, having bone density which is almost the same as when using bovine as bone graft, easy to produce and inexpensive, made the eggshell bone graft has its own advantages [10], [11].…”

Section: Difference Between Eggshell-derived Bone Graft and Bovine In Terms Of Human Bone Regenerationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Potential Use of Eggshell as Bone Graft Compared with Bovine for Bone Defect: A Systematic Review Study

Wardhana

Idulhaq

Saputra

et al. 2021

Open Access Maced J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background : The use of Bone Graft in the management of Bone Defect is a challenge in the world of orthopedics. Recently, eggshell containing hydroxyapatite has become a new hope in the use of an economical and efficient bone graft in the treatment of bone defects. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the available literature on the clinical performance of eggshells as bone grafts in guided bone regeneration. Method : Two databases (PubMed and Cochrane) were searched from January 2010 to September 2020. Clinical trials using eggshells as bone grafts were included in the review. Animal and in vivo studies were excluded from the review. Results : A total of 202 studies were taken, then screened and 15 studies finally included. Clinical and radiological evaluations show complete recovery after the procedure. Comparison with synthetic hydroxyapatite shows similar healing characteristics. Conclusion : Eggshell compared to bovine showed no difference in bone healing. Within the limitations of the included studies, eggshells can be used safely and efficiently in integrated bone regeneration procedures. Keywords: Bone tissue regeneration; eggshell; bovine; bone defect; bone graft

show abstract

Section: Difference Between Eggshell-derived Bone Graft and Bovine In Terms Of Human Bone Regenerationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Potential Use of Eggshell as Bone Graft Compared with Bovine for Bone Defect: A Systematic Review Study

Wardhana

Idulhaq

Saputra

et al. 2021

Open Access Maced J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Corrigendum to “Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Anorganic Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss) and Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite (Ostim) in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation”

Shirmohammadi

Roshangar

Chitsazi

et al. 2017

International Scholarly Research Notices

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Histologic and Histomorphometric Comparison between Sintered Nanohydroxyapatite and Anorganic Bovine Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Grafting: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Stacchi

Lombardi²,

Oreglia³

et al. 2017

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The presence of vital bone after maxillary sinus augmentation is crucial to enhance the quality of bone-implant interface, ensuring predictable long-term results. The aims of this RCT with split-mouth design were the histologic and histomorphometric comparison of two different biomaterials in sinus elevation after 6 months of healing and the evaluation of the clinical outcomes of implants inserted in the augmented areas after 12 months of prosthetic loading. Twenty-eight patients (10 females, 18 males) were treated with bilateral sinus floor elevation with lateral approach. Pure sintered nanohydroxyapatite (NHA) and anorganic bovine bone (ABB) were used as test and active control, respectively. After six months, 52 bone biopsies were harvested from 26 patients, and 107 implants were inserted in the augmented areas. Histomorphometry showed that, in the two groups, vital bone percentages were 34.9 ± 15% (NHA) and 38.5 ± 17% (ABB) (p = 0.428), marrow spaces percentages were 44.5 ± 18% (NHA) and 43.5 ± 23% (ABB) (p = 0.866), and residual graft percentages were 20.6 ± 13% (NHA) and 22.3 ± 12% (ABB) (p = 0.638). After 6 months of healing, no statistically significant difference was present in histomorphometric outcomes between NHA and ABB groups. Implant survival rate in NHA group after 12 months of loading was 96.4%, showing no statistically significant differences with ABB group.

show abstract

Corrigendum to “Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Anorganic Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss) and Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite (Ostim) in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation”

Cited by 3 publications

References 2 publications

Potential Use of Eggshell as Bone Graft Compared with Bovine for Bone Defect: A Systematic Review Study

Potential Use of Eggshell as Bone Graft Compared with Bovine for Bone Defect: A Systematic Review Study

Corrigendum to “Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Anorganic Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss) and Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite (Ostim) in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation”

Histologic and Histomorphometric Comparison between Sintered Nanohydroxyapatite and Anorganic Bovine Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Grafting: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About