Corrigendum: Multiple solutions for asymptotically q‐linear (p,q)‐Laplacian problems

Abstract

A mistake in the assumptions of case in Theorem 1.1 is corrected. This requires a slight refinement of Lemma 3.6 leading to the multiplicity result.

Corrigendum: Multiple solutions for asymptotically q‐linear (p,q)‐Laplacian problems

“…This is due to the fact that $$$ {\nu}_k^{(1)}=+\infty $$$ for all $$$ k $$$. On the other hand, under assumption $$$ \left({H}_{-}\right) $$$, Theorem 1.1 remains valid in the form stated in [1]. We give below a modified version of Theorem 1.1 $$$ \left({H}_{+}\right) $$$.…”

“…there exist $$$ h,k\in \mathrm{\mathbb{N}} $$$, with $$$ k\ge h $$$, such that $$$ {\ell}_{\infty }<{\eta}_h^{(0)} $$$ and $$$ {\ell}_0^{\prime }>{\nu}_k^{\prime } $$$, where and is the set introduced in [1, Section 2], namely, …”

“…The proof of the present theorem can be done as in [1], relying on Theorem 2.2, and Lemmas 3.2 and 3.7 of [1], that continue to hold, and on the following adjustment of Lemma 3.6.…”