2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum: Is Cognitive Training Effective for Improving Executive Functions in Preschoolers? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By embedding EF exercises in dialogic reading activities, the normal classroom routines were respected without forcing either the child or the adult towards extra-school projects. The feasibility of this ecological approach is in agreement with recent studies highlighting that, especially for preschoolers, working within an ecological context has several advantages such as reduced costs, inclusive approaches, simultaneous involvement of different EF components and high methodological flexibility (e.g., the possibility to choose frequency, duration and daily time of the activities) [9,30]. By combining specific and systematic EF exercises together with a flexible approach, it has been possible to choose the activities according to the child's preferences and performances, thus avoiding frustration and maintaining high children's compliance and motivation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By embedding EF exercises in dialogic reading activities, the normal classroom routines were respected without forcing either the child or the adult towards extra-school projects. The feasibility of this ecological approach is in agreement with recent studies highlighting that, especially for preschoolers, working within an ecological context has several advantages such as reduced costs, inclusive approaches, simultaneous involvement of different EF components and high methodological flexibility (e.g., the possibility to choose frequency, duration and daily time of the activities) [9,30]. By combining specific and systematic EF exercises together with a flexible approach, it has been possible to choose the activities according to the child's preferences and performances, thus avoiding frustration and maintaining high children's compliance and motivation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although further studies on larger samples including experimental and control groups are needed, future perspectives may see the application of QQQ IT to children at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, EF difficulties or low socio-economic level, populations characterized by a week executive function domain [ 5 , 40 , 41 ]. As pointed out by recent systematic reviews [ 9 , 30 ], EF interventions within the school setting are among the most effective training and thus must be encouraged. Within this perspective, QQQ IT can be a daily ecological way for early prevention in children with EF weakness and a useful tool to enhance school prerequisites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is certainly even truer for the specific population of VP infants for whom it is the entire neurodevelopment, in all its cognitive, behavioral and social components, that is impacted by premature birth [ 1 , 83 ]. A 2020 meta-analysis of cognitive training of young children to optimize their EFs which covered 30 studies published between 2009 and 2019 on children aged 3–6 years confirmed this trend [ 161 ]. The benefit of cognitive EF group training, such as the school-based type, is more effective than individual training.…”
Section: Support For the Development Of Efs And Neurobehavioral Funct...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently one metanalysis showed that cognitive training programs for preschoolers are significantly more effective for developmentally at-risk children (ADHD or low socio-economic status) than for children with typical development and without risks. This metanalysis assessed also other factors as the individual vs collective session and the training duration; these two factors were considered significant moderators contrary to the number of sessions and the computerized against non-computerized training [ 36 ]. The efficacy of Cogmed was particularly studied by two scientific publications, Shinaver et al and Spencer-Smith et al [ 33 , 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%