1998
DOI: 10.1029/98gl01977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations of stratospheric abundances of CH4 and N2O derived from ATMOS measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
192
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(8 reference statements)
19
192
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The HNO 3 evaporation from these large particles at lower altitudes may explain the enhancements in the NOy gas phase abundance as observed by the DC-8 [Huebler et al, 1990]. Despite these indications of local denitrification in the Arctic, it is clear that mixing processes can lead to variations in the nitric acid abundance that can be mistaken for denitrification [Michelsen et al, 1998;Kondo et al, 1999]. Hence it is not evident from present in situ data sets that denitrification is a widespread phenomena in the Arctic.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…The HNO 3 evaporation from these large particles at lower altitudes may explain the enhancements in the NOy gas phase abundance as observed by the DC-8 [Huebler et al, 1990]. Despite these indications of local denitrification in the Arctic, it is clear that mixing processes can lead to variations in the nitric acid abundance that can be mistaken for denitrification [Michelsen et al, 1998;Kondo et al, 1999]. Hence it is not evident from present in situ data sets that denitrification is a widespread phenomena in the Arctic.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…For NO 2 , CMAM tends to agree with the sunrise NO 2 measurements, but is somewhat higher than the NO 2 measured at sunset. The MANTRA measurements are consistent with the compact correlation between CH 4 and N 2 O seen in the lower stratosphere in the Atmospheric Trace Molecule Spectroscopy (ATMOS) experiment measurements (Michelsen et al, 1998), which is well reproduced by CMAM. However, CMAM appears to overestimate the NO y :N 2 O correlation for mid-latitudes and overestimates NO y during the mid-latitude summer above 20 km.…”
Section: Mantra Results a Measurementssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…[6] Mixing across the polar vortex edge impacts any empirical method to determine chemical O 3 loss and was considered problematic for TRAC [Michelsen et al, 1998;Plumb et al, 2000], especially in the more dynamically active Arctic. On must be cautious applying TRAC to data from CCMs which may exhibit high numerical diffusivity.…”
Section: Data and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%