2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations of Melt Pool Geometry and Process Parameters During Laser Metal Deposition by Coaxial Process Monitoring

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Single weld tracks are placed next to each other in order to form a single layer with thickness varying from 0.1 mm to several millimeters depending on the process parameters (velocity, powder feed rate, and laser power) [ 1 , 7 ]. In order to coat wide surfaces on 3D complex geometries, side overlapping of the individual laser traces is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single weld tracks are placed next to each other in order to form a single layer with thickness varying from 0.1 mm to several millimeters depending on the process parameters (velocity, powder feed rate, and laser power) [ 1 , 7 ]. In order to coat wide surfaces on 3D complex geometries, side overlapping of the individual laser traces is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy absorption in the substrate leads to a net heat increase, causing the surface to melt and therefore increase its absorption coefficient [20]. In the end, if too high energy densities are used for the employed powder flow rate, a re-melting of the substrate is obtained, which causes an inappropriate relationship between powder flow and laser power, making the heat-affected zone of the substrate bigger than the clad width [21]. When comparing the obtained results for equal laser power and powder flow values (Figure 3), the height of the clads is higher for the minimum value of process speed (13 mm/s) than those made with the maximum value (27 mm/s).…”
Section: Individual Clad Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy absorption in the substrate leads to a net heat increase, causing the surface to melt and therefore increase its absorption coefficient [20]. In the end, this results in remelting of the substrate, making the heat affected zone surrounding the clad to be bigger than with a more appropriate relationship between powder flow and laser power [21].…”
Section: Individual Clad Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%