2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.03.024133
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations enhance the behavioral readout of neural population activity in association cortex

Abstract: These correlations can take the form of correlations between 47 the spike rates of two individual cells, which we call across-neuron noise correlations. Similarly, 48 neural population activity at a given time in response to a stimulus is often correlated with the activity 49 of the same population at other times, which we refer to as across-time noise correlations. 50 51The impact of across-neuron and across-time correlations has been long debated. Much experimental 52and theoretical work has proposed that… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both primates and rodents, temporal scales of these intrinsic fluctuations increase along various cortical hierarchies 11,[43][44][45] . Mechanistically, the nature of these intrinsic processes remains unclear, but most authors attribute them to temporally extended input integration or recurrent computations, meant to sustain the neural representation over timescales that guide perception and behavior 44,45,63 . Experimentally, however, most work in the ventral stream has focused on static stimuli, and thus it is not known whether intrinsic dynamics contribute to the structure of population codes for stimuli that are themselves varying in time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In both primates and rodents, temporal scales of these intrinsic fluctuations increase along various cortical hierarchies 11,[43][44][45] . Mechanistically, the nature of these intrinsic processes remains unclear, but most authors attribute them to temporally extended input integration or recurrent computations, meant to sustain the neural representation over timescales that guide perception and behavior 44,45,63 . Experimentally, however, most work in the ventral stream has focused on static stimuli, and thus it is not known whether intrinsic dynamics contribute to the structure of population codes for stimuli that are themselves varying in time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrinsic processing may be crucial for perception in a noisy, changing environment. For example, maintenance of sensory information by stimulus-independent temporal correlations in population activity can lead to better behavioral performance, when consistent estimates of a quantity are needed 45,63 . Alternatively, intrinsic processing may support predictive coding 39,41 , allowing neural circuits to use feedforward inputs to predict and represent what will happen next, an ability with obvious utility for behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Complementary to this approach, it would be of considerable interest to study the Bauplan of the brain at a cellular level or circuit level. It is well-known that cell-to-cell (rather than region-to-region or even voxel-to-voxel) interactions on a very fine spatial scale can influence the dynamics of the brain even on relatively long the time scales (seconds) relevant for the dynamical measures considered here 56,57 . Progress has been made at finer scales as shown by the discovery of the signature of turbulence at the circuit level in the rodent hippocampus 29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, dDR components explicitly preserve stimulus-independent population covariability. In addition to being important for overall information coding, this covariability is known to depend on behavior state 15,16,20,25,31 and stimulus condition. 21,[32][33][34] Therefore, approaches that do not preserve these dynamics, such as trial-averaged P CA, may not accurately characterize how information coding changes across varying behavior and/or stimulus conditions.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%