2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.91.205310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations between axial and lateral emission of coupled quantum dot–micropillar cavities

Abstract: We report on optical studies of coupled quantum dot-micropillar cavities using a 90 • excitation-and-detection scheme. This specific configuration allows us to excite the micropillar structures either in the axial direction or in the lateral direction and to simultaneously detect emission from both directions. That enables us to reveal correlations between emission into the cavity mode and the leaky modes in the regime of cavity quantum electrodynamics. In particular, we can access and distinguish between axia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This setup has a perpendicular configuration of the excitation and the detection paths. The main advantage of side-excitation here is that the laser light is not (partially) blocked by the stop-band of the top DBR [46]. Therefore, an efficient and homogeneous, i.e.…”
Section: Sample Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This setup has a perpendicular configuration of the excitation and the detection paths. The main advantage of side-excitation here is that the laser light is not (partially) blocked by the stop-band of the top DBR [46]. Therefore, an efficient and homogeneous, i.e.…”
Section: Sample Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…side-excitation as used in this study. At the same time it opens up a possibility to collect the signal in the lateral direction, e.g., to monitor the direct QD spontaneous emission into free space or loss channels of the micropillar cavity [28]. The micropillars are structured into the wafer material using a rhombic pattern with an offset (Δrow) of 2.5 µm for each row of micropillars counting from the cleaved edge.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intended role of this rhombic pattern of the micropillar array is to increase the number of micropillar structures available for side-excitation, since it prevents shadowing of micropillars in the first four rows from micropillars closer to the edge and potentially enhances stray-light suppression by spatially separating light scattered by the cleaved edge from the micropillar top facets. For our spectroscopic studies the micropillar sample is mounted inside a helium flow cryostat and kept at a constant temperature of 15 K. We employed an experimental setup (figure 2) in which we excite QDs embedded in micropillars via side-excitation (blue), and detect emission through the top facet using a second independent beam path (red) [14,28]. In the side-excitation beam path we employ a long working distance microscope objective with a numerical aperture (NA) of 0.4 and magnification of 20 times and in the detection beam path an objective with NA = 0.65 and 50 times magnification.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This geometrical limitation leads to the assumption that γ is similar to the free space decay rate γ hom [13]. Under this assumption, the only approach to achieving a high β factor is an enhancement of the decay rate into the CM (Purcell enhancement) compared to homogeneous material [8,[25][26][27]. However, for the wavelength-scale micropillar cavity used here, the geometry is very different from an atom cavity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%