1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01563.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlational and Known‐Group Comparison Validation of a Workplace Prejudice/Discrimination Inventory

Abstract: A new inventory designed to assess perceptions of prejudice and discrimination experiences on the job was developed. Three approaches to validating it were employed. First, factor analysis was done for responses from one set of workers then replicated with responses from a second sample. These analyses indicated that a single significant factor accounted for a large proportion of the variance in responses to 15 of the 16 items on the inventory. Second, to begin to develop its place in a nomological network, a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in-group perceptions are important for positive selfworth, distinctions made between in-groups and out-groups at work can bring about exclusion, discrimination and prejudice based on one's perceived social identity (James et al, 1994). Additionally, individuals' own organizational identity influences their thinking and behavior about other aspects of work (Mor Barak, 2011).…”
Section: Organizational Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in-group perceptions are important for positive selfworth, distinctions made between in-groups and out-groups at work can bring about exclusion, discrimination and prejudice based on one's perceived social identity (James et al, 1994). Additionally, individuals' own organizational identity influences their thinking and behavior about other aspects of work (Mor Barak, 2011).…”
Section: Organizational Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinctions made between in-group and out-group membership has the potential to bring about negative consequences at work, especially for those who are perceived to be in the minority of the relevant social category (James et al, 1994). This often happens "when the characteristic(s) on which that grouping is based are normatively associated with low status and negative stereotypes" (James et al, 1994, p. 1575).…”
Section: Social Identity and Self-categorization Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived identity shapes peoples' in-group and out-group perceptions, emotions, and behaviors (Hogg & Terry, 2000;Turner, 1981), and in the context of the workplace, both intra-group and inter-group feelings and relations are affected (Hogg & Terry, 2000;Messick & Mackie, 1989). While in-group perceptions are important for positive self-worth (James et al, 1994), distinctions made between in-groups and outgroups at work can bring about exclusion, discrimination and prejudice based on one's perceived social identity. Additionally, individual experiences in the workplace and their perceptions of organizational actions and policies will be affected by their identity group memberships (Mor Barak, 2011).…”
Section: Taxonomy Of Workplace Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bias was measured using five items adapted from James, Lovato and Cropanzano (1994) and the remaining 5 items from Shaw (2004). Based on the results of exploratory factor analysis (EFA), this study used only 8 items.…”
Section: Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%