2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of optic nerve sheath diameter measurements by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…and ) . Findings on computed tomography (CT), such as bony scalloping, widening of the optic canal, and skull base dehiscence (both anterior and lateral), may also be suggestive but lack sensitivity and specificity …”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and ) . Findings on computed tomography (CT), such as bony scalloping, widening of the optic canal, and skull base dehiscence (both anterior and lateral), may also be suggestive but lack sensitivity and specificity …”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 Findings on computed tomography (CT), such as bony scalloping, widening of the optic canal, and skull base dehiscence (both anterior and lateral), may also be suggestive but lack sensitivity and specificity. 53,57 THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM Following diagnosis, optimal management of IIH requires multidisciplinary input from at least an ophthalmologist and neurologist. Neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists, bariatric surgeons, nutritionists, and sleep specialists may also play significant roles.…”
Section: The Modified Dandy Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in the cranial computed tomography and magnetic resonance imagining sections were found to correlate well with the invasively measured ICP levels in previous studies [3,4]. However, it is obvious that these modalities are not suitable for continuous monitoring of critically ill patients and may not be available in emergency settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Geeraerts et al demonstrated a positive correlation between MRI-derived ONSD and invasively measured ICP (r = 0.71), and using a 5.82 mm cutoff, they determined that the ability of ONSD to detect ICP > 20 mmHg was excellent with AUC = 0.94 and NPV of 92 % [30,31]. Interestingly, a comparison of CT to MRI concluded that the two modalities produce comparable measurements of ONSD [32].…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Mri)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skau et al[68] ▪ Comparison to ICP measured via lumbar puncture (LP)Kalantari et al[32] ▪ No comparison to invasively measured ICP ▪ ONSD measured by CT and ONSD measured by MRI correlate strongly with r = 0.8941Ocular ultrasound vs. CTOhle et al[108] ▪ No comparison to invasively measured ICP ▪ Meta-analysis with 12 studies ▪ ONSD determined by ocular ultrasound is 95.6 % sensitive and 92.3 % specific for CT findings suggestive of increased ICP (ex. shift, collapse of ventricles, intracranial bleeding of greater than 2 mm) ▪ ONSD cutoff values:Ragauskas et al[73] ▪ Comparison to ICP measured via lumbar puncture (LP) ▪ Elevated ICP defined as ICP > 14.7 mmHg…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%