Using a representative database, we found a much higher prevalence of VM in the United States than previously reported. Results from this study indicate likely under-diagnosis of VM.
Objective:Compare Eustachian tube balloon dilation versus continued medical therapy (control) for treating persistent Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD).Study Design:Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.Setting:Tertiary care academic center and private practice.Patients:Diagnosed with medically refractory persistent ETD.Interventions:1:1 Randomization to balloon dilation or control. After 6 weeks, control participants had the option to undergo balloon dilation if symptoms persisted.Main Outcome Measures:Primary efficacy endpoint was the comparison between treatment arms in the mean change from baseline in the 7-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) score. Primary safety endpoint was complication rate.Results:Sixty participants were randomized (31 balloon dilation, 29 control). Mean (SD) change in overall ETDQ-7 score at 6 weeks was −2.9 (1.4) for balloon dilation compared with −0.6 (1.0) for control: balloon dilation was superior to control (p < 0.0001). No complications were reported in either study arm. Among participants with abnormal baseline assessments, improvements in tympanogram type (p < 0.006) and tympanic membrane position (p < 0.001) were significantly better for balloon dilation than control. Technical success was 100% (91 successful dilations/91 attempts) and most procedures (72%) were completed in the office under local anesthesia. Improvements in the ETDQ-7 scores were maintained through 12 months after balloon dilation.Conclusions:Balloon dilation is a safe and effective treatment for persistent ETD. Based on improved ETDQ-7 scores, balloon dilation is superior to continued medical management for persistent ETD. Symptom improvement is durable through a minimum of 12 months. Procedures are well tolerated in the office setting under local anesthesia.
Oral Presentations P93Conclusions: In the absence of brainstem compression or concern of malignancy, initial observation of JPTs should be considered. A significant number of tumors do not grow after time of diagnosis, and symptoms frequently remain stable for many years. Even with disease progression, most JPTs exhibit indolent growth with slowly progressive cranial neuropathy affording satisfactory physiologic compensation in most patients. The Nervus Intermedius in Children withCochlear Nerve Deficiency Submitted to Auditory Brainstem Implantation Giacomo Colletti, MD (presenter); Marco Mandala, MD; Liliana Colletti; Vittorio Colletti, MD Objectives: Anatomical distortions of the neural structures surrounding the foramen of Luschka (FL) characterize children with cochlear nerve deficiency (CND). Our goal was to investigate the anatomical features of the nervus intermedius (NI) and cranial nerve 7 (CN) VII in children with CND and verify if the NI can provide an additional landmark during auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) surgery, preventing intraoperative injuries of the nearby vessels and nerves.Methods: Sixty-four CND children ranging in age from 8 months to 16 years (2.92 ± 1.54) were video-recorded during retrosigmoid surgery for fitting the ABI and retrospectively examined with particular reference to the number and variety of NI bundles, the associated malformations of CN VII, the relationship with CN VII, and the possibility that NI might represent a landmark for ABI insertion.Results: Absence of CNs VI, VII, and VIII was observed respectively in 3, 8, and all children. Eighteen children showed several abnormalities of CN VII in the cerebellopontine angle. The identification of CN VII and of the bundles comprising NI was possible anatomically in 46 children. In 12 the identification was obtained with the assistance of intraoperative monitoring. The number of bundles comprising the NI varied from 1 to 6. The NI and CN IX were useful landmarks for identifying the FL of the lateral recess.Conclusions: NI provides an additional landmark during ABI microsurgery. Knowledge of NI anatomy and its topographical relationship with the neurovascular structures around the FL may prevent iatrogenic injuries and ABI electrical stimulation of the surrounding cranial nerves.
Objective (1) To analyze reported speech perception outcomes in patients with inner ear malformations who undergo cochlear implantation, (2) to review the surgical complications and findings, and (3) to compare the 2 classification systems of Jackler and Sennaroglu. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus (including Embase), Medline, and CINAHL Plus. Review Methods Fifty-nine articles were included that contained speech perception and/or intraoperative data. Cases were differentiated depending on whether the Jackler or Sennaroglu malformation classification was used. A meta-analysis of proportions examined incidences of complete insertion, gusher, and facial nerve aberrancy. For speech perception data, weighted means and standard deviations were calculated for all malformations for short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up. Speech tests were grouped into 3 categories-closed-set words, open-set words, and open-set sentences-and then compared through a comparison-of-means t test. Results Complete insertion was seen in 81.8% of all inner ear malformations (95% CI: 72.6-89.5); gusher was reported in 39.1% of cases (95% CI: 30.3-48.2); and facial nerve anomalies were encountered in 34.4% (95% CI: 20.1-50.3). Significant improvements in average performance were seen for closed- and open-set tests across all malformation types at 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions Cochlear implantation outcomes are favorable for those with inner ear malformations from a surgical and speech outcome standpoint. Accurate classification of anatomic malformations, as well as standardization of postimplantation speech outcomes, is necessary to improve understanding of the impact of implantation in this difficult patient population.
Objectives: 1) Review controversies pertaining to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. 2) Discuss the evolving role of otolaryngologists in managing this disease and related disorders.Data Sources: Primary literature review, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website, International Classification of Headache Disorders, Second Edition.Methods: A comprehensive review of the primary literature was performed from 1990 to 2016 utilizing keywords idiopathic intracranial hypertension, pseudotumor cerebri, benign intracranial hypertension, spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak, and encephalocele. Articles were included at the discretion of the authors based on novel and/or historical contributions to the literature.Results: The incidence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension is increasing along with the obesity epidemic. Undiagnosed patients may present to otolaryngologists with pulsatile tinnitus, dizziness, sleep apnea, and spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Although diagnosis is predicated upon imaging findings and lumbar puncture, radiographic signs including empty sella, optic nerve dilation, and globe flattening may suggest the diagnosis. The most effective intervention is weight loss combined with acetazolamide. Surgery is reserved for severe or refractory symptoms and can be highly morbid. Otolaryngologists are increasingly responsible for managing a number of secondary disorders including cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea and otorrhea. Failure to manage intracranial hypertension may lead to adverse surgical outcomes.Conclusions: The knowledge base for idiopathic intracranial hypertension has greatly expanded over the past 25 years. This disease is associated with a number of conditions directly relevant to otolaryngologists. A keen understanding of this disorder and its management may optimize outcomes in a growing number of patients.
Objective To examine the effectiveness of eustachian tube balloon dilation for the treatment of eustachian tube dysfunction. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Review Methods A systematic review of eustachian tube balloon dilation for the treatment of eustachian tube dysfunction was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to identify randomized control trials and prospective and retrospective studies published prior to January 31, 2019. Meta-analysis of proportions evaluated 7-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ7) scores, tympanometry, otoscopy findings, and the ability to perform a Valsalva maneuver. Results The systematic review identified 35 studies. Twelve studies met inclusion for meta-analysis (448 patients). Mean ETDQ7 scores decreased by 2.13 from baseline to 6 weeks (95% CI, –3.02 to −1.24; P < .001). From baseline to 6 weeks, 53.0% of patients had improvement in tympanograms ( P < .001). At the long-term point (3-12 months), 50.5% of patients had improved tympanograms from baseline ( P < .001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of improved tympanograms at 6 weeks compared to long term ( P = .535). Normal otoscopy exams at baseline increased by 30.0% at 6 weeks ( P < .001) and 55.4% in the long term ( P < .001). There was a 67.8% increase in proportion of patients able to perform a Valsalva maneuver in the long term compared to baseline ( P < .001). Conclusion Eustachian tube balloon dilation appears to be associated with improvement in subjective and objective treatment outcome metrics. The improvement appears stable at 3 to 12 months after dilation. Patients with eustachian tube dysfunction are likely to benefit from balloon dilation, particularly those with medication-refractory disease.
Patients with SSCD have a marked thinning of the lateral skull base, more so than patients with spontaneous CSF otorrhea and control groups with different BMIs. Skull base attenuation in SSCD patients did not correlate with BMI.
Objective To assess the efficacy of the various therapies used for the prevention of vestibular migraine (VM). Methods Primary studies were identified though PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library by two independent investigators for articles published through April 2019. The search identified randomized comparison or observational studies pertaining to vestibular migraine treatment. Meta‐analysis was performed on pre‐ and posttreatment Dizziness Handicap Inventory, vertigo frequency, and percentage of perceived improvement. Results Literature search identified 13 studies that reported sufficient outcome measures to be included in the analysis. Patients with VM had a mean age of 43.3 years with female‐to‐male gender ratio of 2.1:1. Classes of therapeutic agents included antiepileptic drugs, calcium channel blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, β‐blockers, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and vestibular rehabilitation. All treatment options that were analyzed demonstrated improvement in all of the outcome parameters, but due to significant heterogeneity and lack of standardized reporting on outcomes, establishment of preferred treatment modality could not be determined. Conclusions Various treatment modalities have been evaluated for preventative treatment of VM. Physician familiarity, patient comorbidities, and the side‐effect profiles of various interventions likely influence the selection of intervention. Future randomized controlled trials with restrictive inclusion criteria and generalizable standardized outcome measures will allow for more robust meta‐analyses and for more evidence‐based treatment of vestibular migraines. Laryngoscope, 131:186–194, 2021
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.