2017
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Low-Frequency Noise to the Dynamic Properties of the Sensing Surface in Electrolytes

Abstract: Low-frequency noise (LFN) is of significant implications in ion sensing. As a primary component of LFN for ion sensing in electrolytes, the solid/liquid interfacial noise remains poorly explored especially regarding its relation to the surface binding/debinding dynamic properties. Here, we employ impedance spectroscopy to systematically characterize this specific noise component for its correlation to the dynamic properties of surface protonation (i.e., hydrogen binding) and deprotonation (i.e., hydrogen debin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Downscaling SiNWFETs, aiming to increase the surface-to-volume ratio for extremely low concentration detections, inevitably leads to increase of the noise intensity dramatically. , For a SiNWFET sensor operating in electrolytes, the noise has three main components, i.e., the bulk electrolyte noise, the solid–liquid interface noise, and the SiNWFET intrinsic device noise, with the latter two being dominant. Our previous study points out that the solid–liquid interface noise can be reduced by decreasing the number of binding sites with large kinetic barriers. In this study we aim to reduce SiNWFET intrinsic device noise by replacing oxide/semiconductor interfaces with metal/semiconductor Schottky junctions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Downscaling SiNWFETs, aiming to increase the surface-to-volume ratio for extremely low concentration detections, inevitably leads to increase of the noise intensity dramatically. , For a SiNWFET sensor operating in electrolytes, the noise has three main components, i.e., the bulk electrolyte noise, the solid–liquid interface noise, and the SiNWFET intrinsic device noise, with the latter two being dominant. Our previous study points out that the solid–liquid interface noise can be reduced by decreasing the number of binding sites with large kinetic barriers. In this study we aim to reduce SiNWFET intrinsic device noise by replacing oxide/semiconductor interfaces with metal/semiconductor Schottky junctions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to association and dissociation of analyte, motion in a direction perpendicular to the sensor surface is expected to add noise as the analyte goes in and out of the Debye length. 43,44 LC-TEM, especially on functional GFET devices, appears poised to enable these investigations.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations provide information which is potentially valuable toward understanding the sources of noise or transients in the sensor response in a number of analyte capture strategies. Recent theoretical studies consider association and dissociation of the analytes as the only source of noise, however the role of rotational motion of captured analyte on sensor surfaces or of variability in radius of the positional fluctuation envelope on sensor noise is yet to be investigated in detail. Similar to association and dissociation of analyte, motion in a direction perpendicular to the sensor surface is expected to add noise as the analyte goes in and out of the Debye length. , LC-TEM, especially on functional GFET devices, appears poised to enable these investigations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, how to improve the working signal-to-noise ratio is the current research focus of underwater towed antennas [3,4,5,6,7]. Among them, the running speed of the towed antenna is an important factor affecting the signal reception, and the complex marine environment and motion state bring a variety of noise effects [8,9,10]. The introduced motion noise can be divided into motion polarization noise and motion-induced noise by different formation mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%