2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-022-06134-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of crystalline and optical properties with UV photodetector characteristics of GaN grown by laser molecular beam epitaxy on a-sapphire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response speed of PDs could be evaluated with the rise/fall time, with rise time being the time difference from 10 to 90% of the peak amplitude on the leading edge of the pulse, and fall time being the time difference from 90 to 10% of the trailing edge of the pulse. As for the former reported photoconductive devices, 40,41 the response speed of GaN PD is slow with the rise/fall time evaluated to be 0.17/25.46 s (full transient curve is shown in Figure S10). For MAPbCl 3 PD, a slow trapping and detrapping process can be observed in the rising and falling curve, 45,46 with the rise/fall time evaluated to be 0.19/2.07 ms.…”
Section: Acsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response speed of PDs could be evaluated with the rise/fall time, with rise time being the time difference from 10 to 90% of the peak amplitude on the leading edge of the pulse, and fall time being the time difference from 90 to 10% of the trailing edge of the pulse. As for the former reported photoconductive devices, 40,41 the response speed of GaN PD is slow with the rise/fall time evaluated to be 0.17/25.46 s (full transient curve is shown in Figure S10). For MAPbCl 3 PD, a slow trapping and detrapping process can be observed in the rising and falling curve, 45,46 with the rise/fall time evaluated to be 0.19/2.07 ms.…”
Section: Acsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The responsivity of GaN PD is high, which matches well with the former reported similar photoconductors with rich trap states, contributing a high photoconductive gain. 35,40,41 Figure 3c shows the measured noise current spectral densities of MAPbCl 3 /GaN PD and the control singlelayer devices. The noise spectrum of GaN PD shows a typical flicker noise (1/f) with dominative trend, with the noise level 5 orders of magnitude overall higher than the ones measured in the other two devices.…”
Section: Acsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When UV light is incident on the PD device, e–h pair is generated due to the internal photoelectric effect, and the conduction of these photogenerated charge carriers leads to the photocurrent in the external circuit. Further, the nonlinear I – V curve indicates the formation of Schottky barrier-type contact at the metal/semiconductor interface . The Schottky barrier formation occurs due to the difference between the electron affinity of semiconductor materials (Bi 2 Se 3 = 4.45 and GaN = 4.1 eV) and the work function of the Au metal electrode (5.1 eV). , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the nonlinear I−V curve indicates the formation of Schottky barrier-type contact at the metal/semiconductor interface. 58 The Schottky barrier formation occurs due to the difference between the electron affinity of semiconductor materials (Bi 2 Se 3 = 4.45 and GaN = 4.1 eV) and the work function of the Au metal electrode (5.1 eV). 59,60 Further, to deeply understand the photoresponse behavior of the MSM UV PD devices, we have performed the transient device 1, the photocurrent at 5 V and 15 mW was found to be ∼60 μA [Figure 5a], whereas the device formed on the junction (device 2) has a photocurrent of ∼344 μA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the production of excellent detectors often needs to overcome some existing problems, such as selecting a suitable device substrate, solving lattice mismatches and avoiding poor film quality due to inconsistent molar ratio with metal ions. To solve these problems, it often requires very complex processes and expensive equipment, such as atomic layer deposition, laser molecular beam epitaxy (LMBE), lateral epitaxy overgrowth, metal-organic chemical vapor deposition, pulsed atomic layer epitaxy, pulsed laser deposition, RF magnetron sputtering and reduced area epitaxy [10,[13][14][15][16][17][18]. The detectors made by these methods are not only complex in technology, but also high in cost and energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%