Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine XIV and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems 1986
DOI: 10.1117/12.975430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation Of 3D Surfaces From Multiple Modalities In Medical Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 In contrast, retrospective methods are attractive because they can be applied at any time after the acquisition of the image data and require no external devices. The retrospective techniques currently in use are surface matching, 6-10 principal axes transformation, [10][11][12][13][14] and voxel intensity matching. [15][16][17] Coregistration alone may not accurately match the MRI and histological data sets together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 In contrast, retrospective methods are attractive because they can be applied at any time after the acquisition of the image data and require no external devices. The retrospective techniques currently in use are surface matching, 6-10 principal axes transformation, [10][11][12][13][14] and voxel intensity matching. [15][16][17] Coregistration alone may not accurately match the MRI and histological data sets together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next logical step in 3-D imaging will be the combination of data from different modalities in one 3-D image. Possible combinations are angiography or digital subtraction angiography with CT [107], CT with MRI [108], all 3 of these [109], or laser scanning with CT [33]. Problems such as difference in scaling factors (voxel size), orientation, and patient position during the 2 examinations, and the possible lack of fiducial points that are common in both data sets, will have to be addressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where, C denotes the normalized crossed-correlation coefficients between images A and B, which are ROIs taken from the (k-1)th and kth frames, respectively. We found the normalized cross-correlation operation between overlapping neighboring images [9]- [11] to be the most effective and accurate method to determine the 2D offset between the two adjacent images. Since the relative change in position of the vehicle, from one frame to the next, is small and dominated by the forward motion of the vehicle, the cross-correlation operation can be run faster and more efficiently by performing the calculation over a small region of the images from the two contiguous frames (Fig.…”
Section: Mosaickingmentioning
confidence: 99%