2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2014.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between solid–solid contact ratios and lubrication regimes measured by a refined electrical resistivity circuit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As outlined in Section 2.5, those signals were used to determine the solid-solid contact ratio by dividing the integral of the output signal over the input signal. [30]. Since the sphere and sample are well separated, the output signal is zero, which is also reflected in the calculated solid-solid contact ratio of 0.44%.…”
Section: Calibration Of the Electrical Resistivity Circuitmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As outlined in Section 2.5, those signals were used to determine the solid-solid contact ratio by dividing the integral of the output signal over the input signal. [30]. Since the sphere and sample are well separated, the output signal is zero, which is also reflected in the calculated solid-solid contact ratio of 0.44%.…”
Section: Calibration Of the Electrical Resistivity Circuitmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This suggests that irregularities in the surface topography (ball and/or polished reference) do not significantly influence the results of the experiment. [30]. Since the sphere and sample are well separated, the output signal is zero, which is also reflected in the calculated solid-solid contact ratio of 0.44%.…”
Section: Calibration Of the Electrical Resistivity Circuitmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations