2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242012000600014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation analysis of alveolar bone loss in buccal/palatal and proximal surfaces in rats

Abstract: Abstract:The aim was to correlate alveolar bone loss in the buccal/palatal and the mesial/distal surfaces of upper molars in rats. Thirty-three, 60-day-old, male Wistar rats were divided in two groups, one treated with alcohol and the other not treated with alcohol. All rats received silk ligatures on the right upper second molars for 4 weeks. The rats were then euthanized and their maxillae were split and defleshed with sodium hypochlorite (9%). The cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) was stained with 1% methylene … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, first and third molars were gently removed followed by standardized pictures of the mesial and distal surfaces, allowing the same as the measurements performed in buccal and palatal surfaces. It is important to emphasize that a positive correlation between alveolar bone loss in buccal/palatal and proximal surfaces has been shown, which improves the use of this new approach to quantify alveolar bone loss in Wistar rats (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, first and third molars were gently removed followed by standardized pictures of the mesial and distal surfaces, allowing the same as the measurements performed in buccal and palatal surfaces. It is important to emphasize that a positive correlation between alveolar bone loss in buccal/palatal and proximal surfaces has been shown, which improves the use of this new approach to quantify alveolar bone loss in Wistar rats (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Next, in order to perform proximal measurements, removal of the first and third molars was necessary. After these procedures, measurements were made at three points in each proximal surface (20). For each surface, mean values were calculated and, following, a mean value for the tooth was generated.…”
Section: Morphometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%