1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00250-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation among spatial and non-spatial variables describing a cut-to-length thinning site in the Pacific Northwest, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other US studies on the impact of mechanized cut-to-length harvesting indicate a frequency of residual stand damage between 30% and 40% (Bettinger and Kellogg, 1993;Han and Kellogg, 2000). The fact is that most studies evaluating residual stand damage concern a particular system or set of systems applied to a particular site (Bettinger et al, 1998), and may not integrate the variability of such factors as: the amount of timber removed during harvest (Fjeld and Granhus, 1998); the design of the extraction trails (Gullison and Hardner, 1993); and the skill of the personnel operating the equipment (Bragg et al, 1994). That highlights a main merit of the present study, which is the use of a comparably large data pool, integrating most of the factors that can affect site impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, other US studies on the impact of mechanized cut-to-length harvesting indicate a frequency of residual stand damage between 30% and 40% (Bettinger and Kellogg, 1993;Han and Kellogg, 2000). The fact is that most studies evaluating residual stand damage concern a particular system or set of systems applied to a particular site (Bettinger et al, 1998), and may not integrate the variability of such factors as: the amount of timber removed during harvest (Fjeld and Granhus, 1998); the design of the extraction trails (Gullison and Hardner, 1993); and the skill of the personnel operating the equipment (Bragg et al, 1994). That highlights a main merit of the present study, which is the use of a comparably large data pool, integrating most of the factors that can affect site impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study did not offer reliable information on the relationship between residual stand density and tree damage. Other studies have formalized such important relationship, guiding managers when determining the density of the residual stand (Bettinger et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other forest ecosystem services, such as carbon sequestration, soil protection, and water control may be degraded by residual stand damages, as well (Picchio et al, 2011). Several influencing factors for stand damage are known as: silvicultural treatment and amount of timber removed from harvest (Bettinger et al 1998;Fjeld and Granhus 1998;Gullison and Hardner 1993); logging methods and harvesting system (Bembenek et al, 2013a;2013b;Bragg et al, 1994;Fjeld and Granhus, 1998;Han and Kellogg, 2000;Spinelli et al, 2010;Marchi et al, 2014); design of extraction trails and skill of machine operators (Gullison and Hardner. 1993;Nikooy et al, 2010); logging season, site characteristics and tree species (Bettinger and Kellogg, 1993;Limbeck-Lilienau, 2003;Sist et al, 2003;Vasiliauskas, 2001).…”
Section: -Minimizing Ecological Impacts Of Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the following: tree species (Bettinger and Kellogg 1993;Vasiliauskas 2001), silvicultural treatment (Bettinger et al 1998), logging season (Limbeck-Lilienau 2003), logging methods (Bragg et al 1994;Spinelli et al 2010;Marchi et al 2014), harvesting system , site characteristics (Sist et al 2003), amount of timber removed during harvest (Fjeld and Granhus 1998;Gullison and Hardner 1993), design of the extraction trails (Gullison and Hardner 1993), and skill of the personnel operating the equipment (Wallentin 2007;Nikooy et al 2010). The effect of damage on tree growth has been also investigated showing contrasting results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%