2020
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c06508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlating the Influence of Disulfides in Monolayers across Photoelectron Spectroscopy Wettability and Tunneling Charge-Transport

Abstract: Despite their ubiquity, self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of thiols on coinage metals are difficult to study and are still not completely understood, particularly with respect to the nature of thiol–metal bonding. Recent advances in molecular electronics have highlighted this deficiency due to the sensitivity of tunneling charge-transport to the subtle differences in the overall composition of SAMs and the chemistry of their attachment to surfaces. These advances have also challenged assumptions about the spont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(128 reference statements)
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Returning to the gold analogy, we note that disulfides also form SAMs on Au, first through strong physisorption and then by chemisorption following S–S homolytic bond cleavage, ,, both under ambient conditions , and under electrochemical control . It is mostly agreed that disulfides are physisorbed first then undergo hemolytic cleavage on Au surfaces forming Au–S bonds . However, on Si, there is no evidence of strong physisorption of sulfur-containing compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Returning to the gold analogy, we note that disulfides also form SAMs on Au, first through strong physisorption and then by chemisorption following S–S homolytic bond cleavage, ,, both under ambient conditions , and under electrochemical control . It is mostly agreed that disulfides are physisorbed first then undergo hemolytic cleavage on Au surfaces forming Au–S bonds . However, on Si, there is no evidence of strong physisorption of sulfur-containing compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…60 It is mostly agreed that disulfides are physisorbed first then undergo hemolytic cleavage on Au surfaces forming Au−S bonds. 61 However, on Si, there is no evidence of strong physisorption of sulfur-containing compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…79,114 Although the surface attachment chemistry can vary, thiol-SAMs are not limited to (coinage) metals and will form on semiconductor materials, such as GaAs, [115][116][117] InP, 118,119 MoS 2 , and WSe 2 . 120 Other sulfur-containing groups, such as sulfides, disulfides, [121][122][123][124] and thiocyanates, 125,126 are also capable of forming SAMs. However, despite their versatility over the selection of substrates, thiols and their derivatives do not form SAMs on the surfaces of oxides.…”
Section: A Thiols and Their Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mixed monolayers were formed in reverse order compared to the fullerene, with SAMs of pure spiropyran being incubated in solutions of short alkanethiols. A detailed study of this process by Kumar et al 124 using XPS revealed that the alkanethiols undergo metathesis with the weakly bound disulfides that anchor the spiropyrans, converting them to metal-thiolate bonds as they reorganize the SAM into a mixed monolayer. This shows that in-place exchange is a generalizable strategy for producing high-quality SAMs by removing disulfides as well as for forming mixed monolayers.…”
Section: Self-assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The S2p region is more interesting as it reveals the nature of interactions between the SAM and the gold substrate. Two components are present [29] , [30] : The first at 162 eV attributed to thiol groups chemisorbed on the metal (-S-Au). The second at 163.5 eV corresponding to free thiol groups physisorbed on the surface (-S-H).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%