2008
DOI: 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2008.tb00117.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlates of physical violence at school: A multilevel analysis of Australian high school students

Abstract: Studies of school violence have been generally been informed either by social disorganisation or social control theory. However applications of social disorganisation theory to school violence sometimes make little attempt to control for individual differences in propensity to violent behaviour. This study of 2,616 Australian high school students uses multilevel modelling techniques to see whether various characteristics of the school (e.g. lack of clarity about school rules, school responsiveness to racism, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An early, influential example of this type of research found that across 12 neighborhoods, community-level measures of the extent of social disorganization and criminal subcultures had direct, positive effects on individual-level delinquency and also had indirect effects through the significant negative effect of traditional bonding measures on delinquency (Simcha-Fagan & Schwartz, 1986). More recent studies, many of which employed multilevel modeling techniques, have been able to account for the influence of school characteristics (Grunseit et al, 2008;Hoffman & Ireland, 2004;Khoury-Kassabri et al, 2009;Wilcox et al, 2006), community characteristics (Bernburg & Thorlindsson, 2007;McNulty & Bellair, 2003), or both (Benbenishty & Astor, 2005;Gottfredson et al, 2005;Kirk, 2009;Watkins, 2008;Welsh et al, 1999Welsh et al, , 2000 on individual delinquent or "at-risk" behavior.…”
Section: Crime In the School Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An early, influential example of this type of research found that across 12 neighborhoods, community-level measures of the extent of social disorganization and criminal subcultures had direct, positive effects on individual-level delinquency and also had indirect effects through the significant negative effect of traditional bonding measures on delinquency (Simcha-Fagan & Schwartz, 1986). More recent studies, many of which employed multilevel modeling techniques, have been able to account for the influence of school characteristics (Grunseit et al, 2008;Hoffman & Ireland, 2004;Khoury-Kassabri et al, 2009;Wilcox et al, 2006), community characteristics (Bernburg & Thorlindsson, 2007;McNulty & Bellair, 2003), or both (Benbenishty & Astor, 2005;Gottfredson et al, 2005;Kirk, 2009;Watkins, 2008;Welsh et al, 1999Welsh et al, , 2000 on individual delinquent or "at-risk" behavior.…”
Section: Crime In the School Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to assess the relative impact of any specific influence on violence must situate such effects in context and in relation to other overlapping factors. Youth violence is predicted by individual (i.e., impulsivity), family (i.e., harsh parenting), and community (i.e., high crime neighborhoods) risk factors (Grunseit et al, 2008). Current evidence on the nature of violent behavior among young adults is lacking as much of the existing literature has examined intimate partner violence (IPV) and dating violence specifically (Farrington et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%