2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00101-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal

Abstract: Spoken languages have been classified by linguists according to their rhythmic properties, and psycholinguists have relied on this classification to account for infants' capacity to discriminate languages. Although researchers have measured many speech signal properties, they have failed to identify reliable acoustic characteristics for language classes. This paper presents instrumental measurements based on a consonant/vowel segmentation for eight languages. The measurements suggest that intuitive rhythm type… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
292
3
9

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(311 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(31 reference statements)
7
292
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…By this classification, most Romance languages (e.g., French, Italian, and Spanish) have a rhythm based on the syllable, most Germanic languages (e.g., English, Dutch, and German) have a rhythm based on the stress unit, while languages such as Japanese have a mora-based rhythm. Evidence for these rhythmic classes is reported in several recent investigations (Arvaniti, 1994;den Os, 1988;Fant, Kruckenberg, & Nord, 1991;Nazzi, 1997;Shafer, Shucard, & Jaeger, 1999;Ramus, Nespor, & Mehler, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…By this classification, most Romance languages (e.g., French, Italian, and Spanish) have a rhythm based on the syllable, most Germanic languages (e.g., English, Dutch, and German) have a rhythm based on the stress unit, while languages such as Japanese have a mora-based rhythm. Evidence for these rhythmic classes is reported in several recent investigations (Arvaniti, 1994;den Os, 1988;Fant, Kruckenberg, & Nord, 1991;Nazzi, 1997;Shafer, Shucard, & Jaeger, 1999;Ramus, Nespor, & Mehler, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…English, on the other hand, is known for its strong stress, with vowel reduction a common concomitant of the unstressed syllable (Cruttenden, 1986;Cutler & Carter, 1987). English and French, respectively, are considered models of the two contrasting types, Ôstress-timedÕ and Ôsyllable-timedÕ languages, a longstanding intuitive classification for which investigators are still seeking the relevant acoustic correlates (see Grabe & Low, 2002;Ramus, Nespor, & Mehler, 1999). It is possible, then, that the effect of changing the onset consonant of the accented syllable is experienced differently by infants acquiring a language in which the accented syllable is prominent (as in English) vs. a language in which the accented syllable is less acoustically salient (as in French).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Greenberg (2006), rise time is also important for perceiving intonational grouping because of its links with prosody. This has interesting implications for the notion that languages can be grouped into different rhythm classes, such as stress-versus syllable-timed, on the basis of different formulae quantifying consonantal and vocalic variability (e.g., Arvaniti, 2009;Grabe & Low, 2002;Ramus, Nespor, & Mehler, 1999). These formulae typically depend on durational acoustic differences, but the criteria used to place languages on a rhythmic continuum do not reflect durational variation per se, rather they depend on the extent to which a language has easily-defined prominences or accents (see Dauer, 1983Dauer, , 1987; and extended discussion in Arvaniti, 2009).…”
Section: Table 10mentioning
confidence: 99%