The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2602805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrective Control to Handle Forecast Uncertainty: A Chance Constrained Optimal Power Flow

Abstract: Higher shares of electricity generation from renewable energy sources and market liberalization is increasing uncertainty in power systems operation. At the same time, operation is becoming more flexible with improved control systems and new technology such as phase shifting transformers (PSTs) and high voltage direct current connections (HVDC). Previous studies have shown that the use of corrective control in response to outages contributes to a reduction in operating cost, while maintaining N-1 security. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these constraints must all be satisfied, only a limited number will be active at the optimal solution [1]. Since the transmission constraints can be numerically challenging and represent a computational bottleneck, this observation can be exploited to devise more efficient solution algorithms, using methods such as, e.g., constraint generation [2], [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these constraints must all be satisfied, only a limited number will be active at the optimal solution [1]. Since the transmission constraints can be numerically challenging and represent a computational bottleneck, this observation can be exploited to devise more efficient solution algorithms, using methods such as, e.g., constraint generation [2], [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With growing uncertainty from renewable generation and fluctuating demand (1) needs to be solved at a much faster time scale in order to adjust generation in response to uncertainty realization. Traditionally, these real-time adjustments are modeled in the OPF using an affine policy [1], [2], [3]. However, the affine policy can be restrictive and is sub-optimal with respect to feasibility and optimality [5].…”
Section: A the Case For Learning Optimal Power Flow Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the necessary real-time adjustments to the generation is modelled using an affine control policy [1], [2], [3], which mimics the behavior of the widely utilized automatic generation control (AGC). While affine policies are simple to handle computationally, they are restrictive, and can be sub-optimal in terms of cost and constraint enforcement [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Refs. [25]- [27] consider stochastic OPF formulations which also incorporate HVDC lines and HVDC grids. However, they all assume a DC-OPF formulation.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the computational complexity is increased. To maintain scalability, we propose to use a constraint generation method to solve the AC-OPF in each step of Algorithm 1 based on [25]: First, we solve the AC-OPF excluding all uncertainty margins (i.e. they are set to zero), except the uncertainty margins for the generators (2c) -(2d) and the HVDC active power (16a) -(16b).…”
Section: Iterative Chance-constrained Ac-opf Optimizing Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%