Corrections to “Predicting the Quality of Spatial Learning via Virtual Global Landmarks”

Abstract

I N THE above article [1], we detected an error in reporting the 10-fold cross-validation result. The correct 10-fold cross-validation result in Table IV is uploaded in this letter.The corrected result of the cross-validation is consistent with our findings [1] that the EEG data associated with virtual global landmark (VGL) [2], [3] stimuli from the VGL group had an overall improvement in Acc and F1 scores compared to local landmarks from the non-VGL group, where Acc and F1 scores improved averagely 14.89% and 21.77%, respectively.