1980
DOI: 10.1177/009385488000700105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correctional Classification and the Prediction of Institutional Adjustment

Abstract: Each of 293 minimum security prisoners was rated by classification of staff members according to the likelihood of serious disciplinary infractions and escapes from custody. Follow-up data were then obtained, and the predictive validity of these ratings was compared with that of selected information extracted from the files of inmates. In predicting outcomes, only escape ratings were statistically significant, and neither escape nor disciplinary ratings contributed significant criterion variance when combined … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the intergroup differences resulting from the Predictive Attribute Analysis are substantial, collectively these factors are only modestly related to infraction-rate group status among prisoners, hence the use of these presituational characteristics alone for classification or prediction purposes within the correctional systems would not be advised. However, it should be noted the variables examined here perform considerably better as predictors of institutional misconduct than do predictive judgments of correctional staff members (Holland and Holt, 1980). The limitations of this study must be considered in the evaluation of the findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…While the intergroup differences resulting from the Predictive Attribute Analysis are substantial, collectively these factors are only modestly related to infraction-rate group status among prisoners, hence the use of these presituational characteristics alone for classification or prediction purposes within the correctional systems would not be advised. However, it should be noted the variables examined here perform considerably better as predictors of institutional misconduct than do predictive judgments of correctional staff members (Holland and Holt, 1980). The limitations of this study must be considered in the evaluation of the findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%