Correction to: The 2018 UK NHS Digital annual report on the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme: a brief commentary

Moller, Naomi; Ryan, Gemma; Rollings, Jasmine; Barkham, Michael

doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2277-2

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a national programme, activity levels and outcomes for all services are reported annually and can be compared. In 2017-2018, nationally 978,477 people attended an initial assessment appointment at an IAPT service in England [39]. Following which, the service was considered 'unsuitable' for service users in 28,733 (3%) cases so they did not proceed on to treatment, and 395,035 (40%) service users were recorded as ending after having had only one appointment.…”

Section: Services and Service Usersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding differences in mental health service use by men: an intersectional analysis of routine data

Smyth

Buckman

Naqvi

et al. 2022

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Rates of help-seeking for common mental health problems are lower for men, but less is known about patterns of engagement once they are in contact with services. Previous research has been limited in its ability to understand the intersection between service user characteristics and engagement. This study compared analytic approaches to investigate intersectional associations between sociodemographic and socioeconomic indicators and use of psychological treatment services by men. Method Data from 9,904 male service users attending two psychological treatment services in London were analysed. The association between ethnicity, sexual orientation, religious affiliation and employment status of service users and service use outcomes was explored using multinomial logistic regression and latent class analysis (LCA). Results Being from a minoritised ethnic background, of Muslim faith, being unemployed, and living in the most deprived neighbourhoods were associated with greater risk of not commencing or completing treatment. Seven classes were identified in LCA, with men predominately differentiated by self-reported ethnicity and religion. Compared with the ‘White British, non-religious’ class, the ‘Asian Muslim’ class and the ‘minoritised ethnic, non-religious’ class were at higher risk of disengagement, whilst the ‘Asian, other religion’ class were at higher risk of being referred elsewhere rather than completing initiated treatment. Conclusions There were significant inequalities in engagement by men associated with ethnicity, religion and socioeconomic status. Compared with the regression models, further nuance was apparent in LCA regarding the intersection of gender, religion and ethnicity. Identifying groups at greater risk of discontinuation of treatment could inform more personalised pathways through care.

show abstract

Section: Services and Service Usersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding differences in mental health service use by men: an intersectional analysis of routine data

Smyth

Buckman

Naqvi

et al. 2022

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Understanding the beliefs and attitudes towards mental health problems held by Muslim communities and acceptability of cognitive behavioural therapy as a treatment: systematic review and thematic synthesis protocol

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionMany barriers prevent Muslims’ accessing mental health services, the aim of this systematic review is to gain an understanding regarding these barriers and consider how they vary across different Muslim communities resident in different countries.Methods and analysisSystematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Index Islamicus databases for studies published in English in addition to the Saudi Digital Library for studies published in Arabic. The review will include quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies published in peer-review journals since 1980. Methodological quality and risk of bias of included papers will be critically appraised independently according to the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Thematic synthesis will be used to extract outcome and analyse data from studies included in the review.Ethics and disseminationThere are considered to be no ethical issues. Findings will be disseminated in both English and Arabic to clinicians and researchers via journal publication and conference presentation(s).Trial registration numberCRD42020192854.

show abstract

Correction to: The 2018 UK NHS Digital annual report on the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme: a brief commentary

Abstract: Following publication of the original article [1], we have been notified that one of the authors’ names is spelled incorrectly. In this Correction the incorrect and correct author name are shown.

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Understanding differences in mental health service use by men: an intersectional analysis of routine data

Understanding differences in mental health service use by men: an intersectional analysis of routine data

Understanding the beliefs and attitudes towards mental health problems held by Muslim communities and acceptability of cognitive behavioural therapy as a treatment: systematic review and thematic synthesis protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About