2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to “Pregnancy-Induced Metabolic Phenotype Variations in Maternal Plasma”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the reproducibility and reliability of the LC/ESI-Q-TOF-MS system, quality control (QC) samples were also prepared by mixing equal volumes (10 ml from each sample of root exudate. The pooled QC sample was injected six times at the beginning of the run to ensure system equilibrium and then after every 6 samples to further monitor the stability of the analysis (Luan et al, 2014;Zhou et al, 2016).…”
Section: Rir =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the reproducibility and reliability of the LC/ESI-Q-TOF-MS system, quality control (QC) samples were also prepared by mixing equal volumes (10 ml from each sample of root exudate. The pooled QC sample was injected six times at the beginning of the run to ensure system equilibrium and then after every 6 samples to further monitor the stability of the analysis (Luan et al, 2014;Zhou et al, 2016).…”
Section: Rir =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to prior studies [25, 2729, 52, 59, 61, 67], the larger sample size of this study, and the co-randomization of pregnant and non-pregnant women (which is not always done [26]) across runs of a more sensitive high-throughput mass-spectrometry metabolomic platform, enabled us to identify a larger number of metabolites associated with pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, in reviewing a Data Note presenting metabolomics and lipidomics data [47] discrepancies in the previously reported methods came to light. This leads to an Erratum being published in the J Proteome Res explaining care should be taken when interpreting some of the results [48]. Availability and scrutiny of code is just as important as data, and our Min-ION™ sequenced reference bacterial genome Data Note [65] had to be corrected after an error in a script had been reported due to a fix supplied by an anonymous online contributor on Github [66].…”
Section: Lessons Learned In Reproducible Data Publishingmentioning
confidence: 99%