Correction to: On the magnitude and dynamics of eddy covariance system residual energy (energy balance closure error) in subsurface drip-irrigated maize field during growing and non-growing (dormant) seasons

Chatterjee, Sumantra; Irmak, Suat; Payero, José O.; Kiliç, Ayşe; Odhiambo, Lameck O.; Rudnick, Daran R.; Sharma, Vivek; Billesbach, David P.

doi:10.1007/s00271-019-00645-3

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The energy balance for SDI corn was investigated by Irmak et al (2014a) and Chatterjee et al (2019) using an eddy covariance system. They concluded that challenges remain in using these measurements for irrigation management.…”

Section: Studies Of Sdi Responses And/or Performance Improvements For Grain and Oilseed Cropsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A 2020 Vision of Subsurface Drip Irrigation in the U.S.

Lamm¹,

Colaizzi²,

Sorensen³

et al. 2021

Transactions of the ASABE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

HighlightsSubsurface drip irrigation (SDI) has continued to expand in irrigation area within the U.S. during the last 15 years.Research with SDI continues for multiple crop types (fiber, grain and oilseed, horticultural, forage, and turf).SDI usage on many crops has matured through research and development of appropriate strategies and technologiesDespite some persistent challenges to successful use of SDI, important opportunities exist for further adoption.Abstract. Subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) offers several advantages over alternative irrigation systems when it is designed and installed correctly and when best management practices are adopted. These advantages include the ability to apply water and nutrients directly and efficiently within the crop root zone. Disadvantages of SDI in commercial agriculture relative to alternative irrigation systems include greater capital cost per unit land area (except for small land parcels), unfamiliar management and maintenance protocols that can exacerbate the potential for emitter clogging, the visibility of system attributes (components and design characteristics) and performance, and the susceptibility to damage (i.e., rodents and tillage) of the subsurface driplines. Despite these disadvantages, SDI continues to be adopted in commercial agriculture in the U.S., and research efforts to evaluate and develop SDI systems continue as well. This article summarizes recent progress in research (2010 to 2020) and the status of commercial adoption of SDI, along with a discussion of current challenges and future opportunities. Keywords: Drip Irrigation, Irrigation, Irrigation systems, Microirrigation, SDI, Water management.

show abstract

Section: Studies Of Sdi Responses And/or Performance Improvements For Grain and Oilseed Cropsmentioning

confidence: 99%