Correction to: In Search of the Common Elements of Clinical Supervision: A Systematic Review

Choy-Brown, Mimi; Baslock, Daniel; Cable, Charissa; Marsalis, Scott; Williams, Nathaniel J.

doi:10.1007/s10488-022-01193-3

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Research in this area has focused on the requirements of the supervisory process: identity formation, disciplinary content, transferential, and working alliance process involved in its pedagogical character pointing toward meta-theoretical commonalities [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. It has also characterized: (1) the roles, functions, and activities to be developed by supervisors and supervisees in dyadic and group processes; (2) the expected outcomes in professional training; and (3) the implications for supervised patients in each instance [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Psychotherapists will then be able to consider the challenges of including new information technologies in their supervisory practice. It takes distance from other recent systematic reviews that have focused on answering questions about: (1) the common clinical supervision factors for psychotherapists [ 12 ]; (2) the clinical supervision effects on supervisees and patients from a certain theoretical-clinical perspective [ 17 ]; (3) the suggestions arising from empirical studies in clinical supervision with standardized guidelines [ 34 ], among the most relevant ones.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Telesupervision in Psychotherapy: A Bibliometric and Systematic Review

Andreucci-Annunziata

Mellado

Vega-Muñoz

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: This systematic review supported by a bibliometric analysis identified quantitative and qualitative empirical studies that allowed us to respond to the objective of identifying and discussing the scope and limitations of the clinical-psychotherapeutic supervision in virtual modality or telesupervision. (2) Methods: The articles were selected according to the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the eligibility criteria proposed by the PICOS strategy (population, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and study design) based on 396 records of scientifically identified articles in the Journal Citation Report databases of the Web of Science. (3) Results: The literature review stages allowed the selection of three articles, which were added three others that were already included in a previous review, to enrich the analysis and discussion. The results of the present review highlighted aspects of nonverbal communication, alliance, comfort, preference, trust, and construction of professional identity, among others, both considering only the telesupervision format and comparing it with traditional face-to-face supervision. (4) Conclusions: The contributions that these results are providing to the understanding of the scope and limitations of the practice of telesupervision are discussed, also considering its interference in the construction of the professional identity of supervisors and supervisees.

show abstract