2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-018-3049-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to: Improving the baking quality of bread wheat by genomic selection in early generations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most used traits of study in genome selection experiments are related to quality improvement involving the use of different prediction models divided between parametric and non-parametric. Michel et al (2018) proved the benefit of GS over marker assisted selection investigating the prediction of dough rheological traits in early generations and adopting the parametric RRBLUP, W-BLUP function. Genomic prediction models are routinely used in the CIMMYT spring bread wheat program since 2013 (Guzman et al, 2016).…”
Section: Genomic Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most used traits of study in genome selection experiments are related to quality improvement involving the use of different prediction models divided between parametric and non-parametric. Michel et al (2018) proved the benefit of GS over marker assisted selection investigating the prediction of dough rheological traits in early generations and adopting the parametric RRBLUP, W-BLUP function. Genomic prediction models are routinely used in the CIMMYT spring bread wheat program since 2013 (Guzman et al, 2016).…”
Section: Genomic Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Hayes et al (2017) conducted a study on genomic prediction of 19 end-use quality traits and observed prediction accuracy greater than .5 for many of the traits (Table 3). Besides this, Michel et al (2018) also carried out GS of baking quality in wheat and reported that an acceptable prediction accuracy of .38-.63 can be obtained in all dough rheological traits.…”
Section: Genomic Selection (Gs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAS cannot account for these interaction effects because most of the markers are initially developed from a mapping population segregating for a single or few QTL which usually leads to overestimation of the QTL effect. Therefore, MAS is mostly constrained to simply inherited or monogenic traits (Michel et al, 2018). In addition, MAS also does not factor the environmental Frontiers in Genetics frontiersin.org influence on the trait leading to lower phenotype prediction accuracy (Xu and Crouch, 2008;Heffner et al, 2009).…”
Section: Marker-assisted Selection (Mas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations