41st Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit 2000
DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-1489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of unsteady aerodynamic influence coefficients using experimental or CFD data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vortex lattice method (VLM) [18] is a fast panel method suitable for aerodynamic loads simulation in the aeroelastic sizing process. Due to the underlying theory, its validity is limited to the subsonic regime but transonic effects can be considered using various correction techniques [19][20][21][22] or an enhancement with CFD calculations for selected parameters [23].…”
Section: Aerodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vortex lattice method (VLM) [18] is a fast panel method suitable for aerodynamic loads simulation in the aeroelastic sizing process. Due to the underlying theory, its validity is limited to the subsonic regime but transonic effects can be considered using various correction techniques [19][20][21][22] or an enhancement with CFD calculations for selected parameters [23].…”
Section: Aerodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the range of application of this method is limited. Corrections of the DLM results can be made based on data from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations or wind tunnel tests to compensate for these assumptions [2,3]. An advantage of the DLM is its formulation in the frequency domain, which eases unsteady analysis in terms of computing time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to fluid dynamics similitude [81], the approximate lift-deficiency functions may finally be parametrised with respect to few fundamental nondimensional numbers, such as Reynolds, Mach and Strouhal numbers of the airflow [82] as well as sweep angle, aspect and thickness ratios of the aircraft wing [42]; correction-based approaches have also been proposed in order to retain the high accuracy of nonlinear CFD at the low computational costs of linear potential-flow aerodynamics [83][84][85][86].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%