2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52718-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of Slice Misalignment in Multi-breath-hold Cardiac MRI Scans

Abstract: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) provides unique functional and anatomical visualisation of the macro and micro-structures of the heart. However, CMR acquisition times usually necessitate slices to be acquired at different breath holds, which results in potential misalignment of the acquired slices. Correcting for this spatial misalignment is required for accurate three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the heart chambers allowing robust metrics for shape analysis among populations as well as precise represen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the image resolution in standard MRI acquisitions does not allow to differentiate right ventricular epicardial and endocardial contours in the right ventricle, we synthesized right epicardial contours by a 3.5 mm offset from the endocardial contours (Prakash, 1978). Spatial misalignments in slice images and spatial discrepancies between the contours due to acquisitions at different breath holds were corrected by aligning intensity profiles of intersecting slices using a 3D rigid transformation for each image (Villard et al, 2017) (see Figure 1A, Contours alignment). Bi-ventricular geometries were built from the aligned contours using the end-diastole frames from the standard CINE acquisition as in Villard et al (2018) and Zacur et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the image resolution in standard MRI acquisitions does not allow to differentiate right ventricular epicardial and endocardial contours in the right ventricle, we synthesized right epicardial contours by a 3.5 mm offset from the endocardial contours (Prakash, 1978). Spatial misalignments in slice images and spatial discrepancies between the contours due to acquisitions at different breath holds were corrected by aligning intensity profiles of intersecting slices using a 3D rigid transformation for each image (Villard et al, 2017) (see Figure 1A, Contours alignment). Bi-ventricular geometries were built from the aligned contours using the end-diastole frames from the standard CINE acquisition as in Villard et al (2018) and Zacur et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable research has focused on correcting slice misalignment induced by respiratory motion between breath holds [5,6] and on reconstructing 3D surfaces from sparse and noisy input data [7,8]. In this paper, we propose a fast and fully automatic geometric deep learning method, capable of addressing both the sparsity and misalignment problem in a single model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard clinical CMR study includes a stack of short-axis (SAX) slices, covering at least from the left/right ventricular (LV/RV) apex to the base, plus at least two long-axis (LAX) views: horizontal long-axis (HLA, also known as 4 chamber view or 4CH) and vertical long-axis (VLA, also known as 2 chamber view or 2CH) [7]. Classical isosurfacing algorithms cannot be directly used due to the sparsity of the input data and because of the presence of motion artefacts (misalignment between slices caused by multiple breath holding and possible body movement during acquisition) [8], which make the task of reconstructing 3D structure from CMR data particularly challenging. Reconstruction of 3D surfaces from CMR data is normally formulated as a 3D mesh adaptation problem to sparse contours or points [9,10,11,12], and solutions often incorporate shape priors during that process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%