2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21949-9_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventricle Surface Reconstruction from Cardiac MR Slices Using Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The point cloud branch architectures ( Figure 2A,B ) are able to apply deep learning operations directly on point cloud data, which allows surface data of much higher resolution to be efficiently processed and used for storing anatomical shape information. This is in contrast to the widely-used voxelgrid representations ( Çiçek et al, 2016 ; Bello et al, 2019 ; Xu et al, 2019 ), which are considerably less memory-efficient at managing surface-level data leading to lower resolution, longer processing times, and ultimately limit the overall accuracy of the modeled anatomy. Furthermore, each of the high-dimensional point clouds combines both the left and right ventricular anatomy and maintains separate labels for the LV endocardium, LV epicardium, and RV endocardium substructures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The point cloud branch architectures ( Figure 2A,B ) are able to apply deep learning operations directly on point cloud data, which allows surface data of much higher resolution to be efficiently processed and used for storing anatomical shape information. This is in contrast to the widely-used voxelgrid representations ( Çiçek et al, 2016 ; Bello et al, 2019 ; Xu et al, 2019 ), which are considerably less memory-efficient at managing surface-level data leading to lower resolution, longer processing times, and ultimately limit the overall accuracy of the modeled anatomy. Furthermore, each of the high-dimensional point clouds combines both the left and right ventricular anatomy and maintains separate labels for the LV endocardium, LV epicardium, and RV endocardium substructures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…voxelgrids) required by classical deep learning approaches (e.g. [11]), which are inefficient at storing sparse surface data and have limited resolution leading to partial volume effects. This reduced spatial efficiency coupled with longer running times is especially disadvantageous for applications in clinical practice and large-scale cardiac physiology simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We sample the translation and rotation values for each level from separate normal dis-tributions with zero mean. The respective standard deviations are selected to reflect realistic values observed in clinical practice [11] (translation: 1.5 mm, 2.5 mm, 3.5 mm; rotation: 0.5 • , 1.5 • , 2.5 • ). Finally, we slice the mesh at the randomly misaligned planes and sample points along each resulting contour to create the input point clouds.…”
Section: Training Data Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A method for simultaneous misalignment and segmentation correction for cardiac images with a final 3D surface reconstruction was introduced in [ 22 ]. A deep learning-based method was proposed in [ 23 ], where the problem of mesh fitting from sparse inputs was transformed into a 3D volumetric inpainting problem followed by isosurfacing from dense volumetric data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%