1993
DOI: 10.1364/ao.32.006742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction for nonlinear photon-counting effects in lidar systems

Abstract: A useful analytic model describing the response of a photon-counting (PC) system has been developed. The model describes the nonlinear count loss and apparent count gain arising from the overlap of photomultiplier tube (PMT) pulses, taking into account the distribution in amplitude of the PMT output pulses and the effect of the pulse-height discrimination threshold. Comparisons between the model and Monte Carlo simulations show excellent agreement. The model has been applied to a PC lidar system with favorable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
86
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For water vapor retrieval, a simple linear fit with a zero-slope (constant noise) is sufficient as no signal-induced noise is present in any of the Raman channels. At the bottom of the channels' useful range, signal non-linearities (pulse pile-up effect) are corrected either empirically using the method described in Donovan et al (1993), or experimentally using the non-saturated signals from the lower intensity channels. The high intensity pair is optimized to provide water vapor measurements between 8 km and 20 km.…”
Section: Profile Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For water vapor retrieval, a simple linear fit with a zero-slope (constant noise) is sufficient as no signal-induced noise is present in any of the Raman channels. At the bottom of the channels' useful range, signal non-linearities (pulse pile-up effect) are corrected either empirically using the method described in Donovan et al (1993), or experimentally using the non-saturated signals from the lower intensity channels. The high intensity pair is optimized to provide water vapor measurements between 8 km and 20 km.…”
Section: Profile Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the detected signal was at least 70% of the signal expected in the absence of saturation. Standard techniques were employed during data processing, using the measured counting linearity curves, to remove distortion associated with PMT and discriminator saturation effects [Donovan et al, 1993].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At high count rates (greater than 10 MHz), the photon counting signal does not respond linearly to the optical power due to overlapping pulses from the detector being counted erroneously as a single pulse. The detection system is unable to count separate individual pulses accurately within a certain 20 time period commonly referred to as dead time t d (Donovan et al, 1993). A dead time correction was applied to the raw photon counting data by calculating the true count rate N T , in terms of the measured count rate N m , as…”
Section: Corrections For Detection Nonlinearity and Signal Induced Noisementioning
confidence: 99%