2016 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iccphot.2016.7492868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correcting perceived perspective distortions using object specific planar transformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we do, it may be that we recognise the scene as of a certain familiar kind. Or it may be that we rely on pictorial cues, which are comparatively distance invariant (albeit subject to perspective distortions / foreshortening: Tehrani et al, 2016), and which are unaffected by telestereoscopic viewing (which increases binocular disparity without reducing viewing distance).…”
Section: Telestereoscopic Viewingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we do, it may be that we recognise the scene as of a certain familiar kind. Or it may be that we rely on pictorial cues, which are comparatively distance invariant (albeit subject to perspective distortions / foreshortening: Tehrani et al, 2016), and which are unaffected by telestereoscopic viewing (which increases binocular disparity without reducing viewing distance).…”
Section: Telestereoscopic Viewingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the tilted angle α is not known, a third point is required to add one more constraint on the centre location curve parametric equations. This equation is depicted in (25).…”
Section: Locating the Centre From Three Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 illustrates the three forms of distortions of a target in the image. Existing methods tried to model the perspective effect [24], some methods are based on the hypothesis constraints by the scene [25], like the position of the vanishing points within the image [26], or benefit from the stereo setup for adding up depth constraints to improve the model for measurements [27]. On the contrary, many other methods are based on learning patterns from a set of image data [13] like face recognition, ball tracking [28] and learning depth [29]- [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work [8] optimizes the parameters in the Pannini projection [7] to preserve regions with greater low-level saliency and straight lines. Interactive methods [10,11,12,13] require a user to outline regions of interest that should be preserved or require input from a user to determine projection orientation [14]. Our approach is content-based and fully automatic.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…conformality, or other low-level cues [7,8,9], optionally using manual input to know what is worth preserving [10,11,12,13,14]. However, all prior automatic content-based projection methods implicitly assume that the viewpoint of the input 360 • image is fixed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%