2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correcting Mortality for Loss to Follow-Up: A Nomogram Applied to Antiretroviral Treatment Programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract: Matthias Egger and colleagues present a nomogram and a web-based calculator to correct estimates of program-level mortality for loss to follow-up, for use in antiretroviral treatment programs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
155
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
12
155
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Not receiving ART was the single factor significantly associated with overall attrition among the 1162 patients studied, while both baseline BMI z-score and receipt of ART were significantly negatively associated with LTFU among all patients in this cohort. The higher rate of LTFU and relatively lower death rate observed in this study are in line with the literature, and most likely due to considerable misclassification of LTFU, that is, many deaths among patients considered LTFU [21,22]. We also think that the high LTFU rate may be due in part to delays in obtaining and entering data, such that patients considered LTFU may actually have unrecorded visits or unrecorded deaths.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Not receiving ART was the single factor significantly associated with overall attrition among the 1162 patients studied, while both baseline BMI z-score and receipt of ART were significantly negatively associated with LTFU among all patients in this cohort. The higher rate of LTFU and relatively lower death rate observed in this study are in line with the literature, and most likely due to considerable misclassification of LTFU, that is, many deaths among patients considered LTFU [21,22]. We also think that the high LTFU rate may be due in part to delays in obtaining and entering data, such that patients considered LTFU may actually have unrecorded visits or unrecorded deaths.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We borrowed from the idea underlying the nomogram approach published by Egger and colleagues31 but adjusted it to fit the needs of the current project. The nomogram approach considers the inverse relationship between the size of lost to follow-up (LTFU) and per cent of LTFU patients who are dead in order to extrapolate the correct (but unknown) death rate among patients who drop out from care.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been observed in a number of instances throughout sub-Saharan Africa where rapid scale-up of care and treatment services result in often chaotic patient self-referral patterns from one clinic to another, which accounts for an increasing proportion of losses to follow-up 30. Using a structured survey of a number of programmes throughout the region, Egger and colleagues constructed a nomogram where a correction factor is estimated according to the mortality ratio between patients who were lost or not and the level of loss to follow-up at a particular programme 31. This correction factor is then used to produce adjusted estimates of 1-year mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although such an assumption is common in practice, it is strong and likely violated in observational HIV studies, and can lead to biased estimates. 28,29 As seen in the current study and elsewhere, 30 LTFU rates can be quite heterogeneous between cohorts, and differential ascertainment of death may explain heterogeneity. 31 The best approach for handling LTFU is through targeted patient tracing, 32 which was not done in this study.…”
Section: Fig 3 (A B)mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…31 The best approach for handling LTFU is through targeted patient tracing, 32 which was not done in this study. Sensitivity analyses can also be employed by assuming specific mortality rates of patients LTFU, 28,33 but were beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Fig 3 (A B)mentioning
confidence: 99%