2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1349-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correcting datasets leads to more homogeneous early-twentieth-century sea surface warming

Abstract: Existing estimates of sea surface temperatures (SSTs) indicate that, during the early twentieth century, the North Atlantic and Northeast Pacific oceans warmed by twice the global average, whereas the Northwest Pacific Ocean cooled by a magnitude equal to the global average 1-4 . Such a heterogeneous pattern suggests first-order contributions from regional variations in forcing or in ocean-atmosphere heat fluxes 5,6 . These older SST estimates are, however, derived from measurements of water temperatures in sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that well‐documented uncertainties in the historical temperature data products during this time period (e.g., Chelton & Risien, 2016) confound our estimation of the temperature effects on Porites density and caused the ~4% decline in density around 1940 that we currently attribute to OA. Efforts to increase the accuracy of the historical temperature records (e.g., Chan et al, 2019) will improve our estimates of the OA impact on coral skeletal growth. Overall, however, the model‐predicted effects of extension and temperature on skeletal density are in good agreement with the independently measured density changes (Figures 3a and 3b), and our results indicate strong impacts of OA on GBR corals post‐1950.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that well‐documented uncertainties in the historical temperature data products during this time period (e.g., Chelton & Risien, 2016) confound our estimation of the temperature effects on Porites density and caused the ~4% decline in density around 1940 that we currently attribute to OA. Efforts to increase the accuracy of the historical temperature records (e.g., Chan et al, 2019) will improve our estimates of the OA impact on coral skeletal growth. Overall, however, the model‐predicted effects of extension and temperature on skeletal density are in good agreement with the independently measured density changes (Figures 3a and 3b), and our results indicate strong impacts of OA on GBR corals post‐1950.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A truly global average of temperature would in addition be affected by missing data, particularly in the Arctic (Karl et al, ). Even fairly recently, an inhomogeneity of SST data, caused by changing contributions by different shipping fleets, has been detected and corrected (Kennedy et al, ), while other inhomogeneities are likely still present, which may lead to an overestimate of the unforced component of the ETCW (Chan & Huybers, n.d.). In addition, there are remaining biases in land temperature data, such as summer temperature biases preceding the widespread use of the Stevenson screen (Auchmann & Brönnimann, ; Brunet et al, ) which may lead to an overestimation of summer temperatures prior to the second half of the 20th century.…”
Section: Observed Large‐scale Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upper ocean variability over decades is comparatively well-observed, including the ENSO cycle, and sea surface temperatures, although problems persist (e.g. Chan et al, 2019). For the heat uptake estimation context, see the reviews by Abraham et al (2013) or Meyssignac et al (2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%