2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00628.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correctable and non‐correctable visual impairment among young males: a 12‐year prevalence study of the Military Service in Poland

Abstract: Appropriate refractive correction improves visual acuity in most subjects presenting with visual impairment. There was a relatively low prevalence of non-correctable visual impairment in a population of young adults in Poland, and this was mainly due to amblyopia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ocular health in military populations has important implications for recruit eligibility [1,2] optimal job performance [2], permanent or temporary medical discharge [2] and deployment-related safety [3,4]. Occular health encompasses both visual readiness (the presence of minimum job-required visual acuity) and optical readiness (the acquisition of appropriate optical correction) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ocular health in military populations has important implications for recruit eligibility [1,2] optimal job performance [2], permanent or temporary medical discharge [2] and deployment-related safety [3,4]. Occular health encompasses both visual readiness (the presence of minimum job-required visual acuity) and optical readiness (the acquisition of appropriate optical correction) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous military ocular health surveys, including pre-recruitment [6] and in-service screening eye examinations [2,5,7,8] have reported a huge range in the prevalence of ophthalmic disorders in various military populations (5-83%). The wide variations in reported prevalence have been attributed to differences in the description of specific ophthalmic disorders [1,2], differences in the sources of data (ranging from military health records to screening eye examinations) [1,2,4,6,9,10] and differences in measured ocular health criteria [2]. Existing literature on ophthalmic disorders among the military is dominated by reports on refractive errors, especially myopia [1,7,9,11,13]; however, colour vision defects [1,10], strabismus [1], glaucoma/ocular hypertension [1], sequelae of eye injuries [3, 4] and non-specific disorders of the ocular anterior and posterior segments [2] have all been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the present study was a continuation of our previous reports as mentioned earlier 5 we used the methodology of refraction measurements and definitions of refractive errors from the Polish Army national regulations for ophthalmic examination [29,30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After allowing for an arbitrary 50% increase in sample size to accommodate possible inefficiencies associated with the sample design, the sample size requirement increased to 991 subjects [6,28]. We decided to define an older adult as person aged ≥ 35 years because in our previous reports conducted on young males in the military population, we considered young adult as person aged 18-34 years [29,30]. We used simple systematic sampling to select our study population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation